Max Houkes vs Timofey Skatov — Amersfoort CH Round of 32

Amersfoort CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
NED
Max Houkes
#244ATP
1460ELO
1444Clay ELO
26 yrs · 188 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLLLLLLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 11 July 2022
clay
Timofey Skatov
KAZ
Timofey Skatov
#163ATP
1544ELO
1531Clay ELO
$107kYTD
$1.1MCAREER
25 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLWWLLL
Houkes M.
7-6 7-6
Skatov T.
Houkes M.
77772
Skatov T.
61640

Max Houkes defeated Timofey Skatov 7-6 7-6 in the Amersfoort CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Houkes M.serving63% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Skatov T.

Skatov T.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Houkes M.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Houkes M.Skatov T.
1st serve in·Even
62%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
67%
66%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
46%
51%
Service points won·Even
59%
61%
Return points won·Even
41%
40%
Break points saved·Even
59%
60%
Aces / match·Even
2.5
2.2
Double faults / match·Clear edge
4.1
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (128 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Houkes M.Skatov T.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
23
29
Break points saved·Clear edge
66
81
Break points won·Even
29
27
Deciding sets·Slight edge
34
28
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
16
31

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Houkes M.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Skatov T.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
4.6Clay Elo 1444
Surface ELO
5.4+87 Clay Elo edge
4.6Overall Elo 1460
ELO gap
5.4Overall Elo 1544
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
Surface form
4.3
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
5.8
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Houkes M.Skatov T.
Freshness·Dominant
89
59

Houkes M.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 16 games (7d) · Skatov T.: 1 day rest · 4 matches, 89 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Griekspoor T.[1]
Carballes Baena R.[2]
6-16-2
Semi-finals
Carballes Baena R.[2]
Zapata Miralles B.[3]
6-766-46-3
Griekspoor T.[1]
Gakhov I.
6-23-66-3
Quarter-finals
Carballes Baena R.[2]
Van Assche L.
6-36-4
Gakhov I.
Houkes M.
6-26-747-65
Zapata Miralles B.[3]
Daniel T.[5]
6-15-77-63
Griekspoor T.[1]
Sachko V.
6-27-64
R16
Carballes Baena R.[2]
Andreev A.
6-46-4
Daniel T.[5]
Lokoli L.
6-16-2
Gakhov I.
Fils A.
6-36-1
Houkes M.
Taberner C.[4]
6-36-3
Sachko V.
Moraing M.[7]
6-37-66
Griekspoor T.[1]
Piros Z.
6-36-726-3
Van Assche L.
Jong S.
6-06-2
Zapata Miralles B.[3]
Lamasine T.
6-16-2
Van Assche L.
Jong A.
6-06-2
R32
Lamasine T.
Kicker N.
7-645-76-3
Andreev A.
Masur D.
7-656-0
Van Assche L.
Bergs Z.[8]
6-34-66-4
Zapata Miralles B.[3]
Krumich M.
5-76-26-4
Lokoli L.
Gutierrez O.
6-26-1
Fils A.
Travaglia S.[6]
6-46-2
Taberner C.[4]
Haase R.
7-56-746-2
Moraing M.[7]
Kuzmanov D.
6-46-4
Griekspoor T.[1]
Barranco Cosano J.
6-16-2
Jong S.
Mayot H.
6-47-5
Piros Z.
Ritschard A.
6-17-66
Sachko V.
Collarini A.
6-34-66-4
Gakhov I.
Wassermann D.
6-47-63
Daniel T.[5]
Furness E.
6-25-77-63
Carballes Baena R.[2]
Sels J.
6-46-3
Houkes M.
Skatov T.
7-617-64
Jong A.
Mayot H.
6-47-5