Carlos Taberner vs Robin Haase — Amersfoort CH Round of 32

Amersfoort CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Carlos Taberner
ESP4
Carlos Taberner
#194ATP
1610ELO
1605Clay ELO
$102kYTD
$1.6MCAREER
28 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWLWWLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 11 July 2022
clay
NED
Robin Haase
39 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWWLLL
Taberner C.
7-5 6-7 6-2
Haase R.
Taberner C.
76462
Haase R.
57721

Carlos Taberner defeated Robin Haase 7-5 6-7 6-2 in the Amersfoort CH round of 32 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Robin Haase came in defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

  • Match story: Carlos Taberner closed it out in three sets, 7–5 6–7 6–2.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Taberner C.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Haase R.

Haase R.serving63% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Taberner C.

Serve advantage — Taberner C.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Taberner C.Haase R.
1st serve in·Even
63%
59%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
65%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
48%
Service points won·Even
59%
62%
Return points won·Slight edge
43%
36%
Break points saved·Even
58%
62%
Aces / match·Dominant
1.6
5.6
Double faults / match·Even
3.5
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 68). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Taberner C.Haase R.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
53
33
Break points saved·Clear edge
74
91
Break points won·Dominant
59
24
Deciding sets·Dominant
75
41
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
22
13

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Taberner C.
4.5
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Haase R.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
2.9
Surface form
6.8
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
8.5
Minutes 14d
7.7
7.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
9.0
3.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Griekspoor T.[1]
Carballes Baena R.[2]
6-16-2
Semi-finals
Carballes Baena R.[2]
Zapata Miralles B.[3]
6-766-46-3
Griekspoor T.[1]
Gakhov I.
6-23-66-3
Quarter-finals
Carballes Baena R.[2]
Van Assche L.
6-36-4
Gakhov I.
Houkes M.
6-26-747-65
Zapata Miralles B.[3]
Daniel T.[5]
6-15-77-63
Griekspoor T.[1]
Sachko V.
6-27-64
R16
Carballes Baena R.[2]
Andreev A.
6-46-4
Daniel T.[5]
Lokoli L.
6-16-2
Gakhov I.
Fils A.
6-36-1
Houkes M.
Taberner C.[4]
6-36-3
Sachko V.
Moraing M.[7]
6-37-66
Griekspoor T.[1]
Piros Z.
6-36-726-3
Van Assche L.
Jong S.
6-06-2
Zapata Miralles B.[3]
Lamasine T.
6-16-2
Van Assche L.
Jong A.
6-06-2
R32
Lamasine T.
Kicker N.
7-645-76-3
Andreev A.
Masur D.
7-656-0
Van Assche L.
Bergs Z.[8]
6-34-66-4
Zapata Miralles B.[3]
Krumich M.
5-76-26-4
Lokoli L.
Gutierrez O.
6-26-1
Fils A.
Travaglia S.[6]
6-46-2
Taberner C.[4]
Haase R.
7-56-746-2
Moraing M.[7]
Kuzmanov D.
6-46-4
Griekspoor T.[1]
Barranco Cosano J.
6-16-2
Jong S.
Mayot H.
6-47-5
Piros Z.
Ritschard A.
6-17-66
Sachko V.
Collarini A.
6-34-66-4
Gakhov I.
Wassermann D.
6-47-63
Daniel T.[5]
Furness E.
6-25-77-63
Carballes Baena R.[2]
Sels J.
6-46-3
Houkes M.
Skatov T.
7-617-64
Jong A.
Mayot H.
6-47-5