Yu Hsiou Hsu vs Borna Gojo — Rome CH Round of 32

Rome CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Yu Hsiou Hsu
TPE
Yu Hsiou Hsu
#210ATP
1489ELO
1407Clay ELO
27 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 11 July 2022
clay
Borna Gojo
CRO5
Borna Gojo
#168ATP
1683ELO
1642Clay ELO
$139kYTD
$1.6MCAREER
28 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLLWWW
Hsu Y.
6-4 6-4
Gojo B.
Hsu Y.
662
Gojo B.
440

Yu Hsiou Hsu defeated Borna Gojo 6-4 6-4 in the Rome CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Yu Hsiou Hsu edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Hsu Y.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Gojo B.

Gojo B.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Hsu Y.

Serve advantage — Gojo B.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Hsu Y.Gojo B.
1st serve in·Even
65%
64%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
67%
76%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
50%
Service points won·Slight edge
61%
67%
Return points won·Even
39%
36%
Break points saved·Slight edge
59%
67%
Aces / match·Dominant
3.5
10.5
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.3
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (185 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Hsu Y.Gojo B.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
36
53
Break points saved·Clear edge
74
95
Break points won·Slight edge
4
10
Deciding sets·Clear edge
50
70
Tiebreaks·Even
77
73

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Hsu Y.
2.9
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 189 days (−1.5)
Gojo B.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry Score
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Form & Matchup
1.9Clay Elo 1407
Surface ELO
8.1+235 Clay Elo edge
2.9Overall Elo 1489
ELO gap
7.1Overall Elo 1683
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
Surface form
5.7
0.0Lost last 6
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
8.7
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
7.0
6.0
Surface transition
3.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Hsu Y.Gojo B.
Freshness·
—
100

Gojo B.: 20 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Agamenone F.
Moroni G.
6-16-4
Wu Y.
Shelton B.
7-56-3
Semi-finals
Moroni G.
Halys Q.[1]
7-646-3
Agamenone F.
Cobolli F.[3]
6-36-4
Wu Y.
Ficovich J.[4]
6-16-0
Shelton B.
Uchiyama Y.
6-16-3
Quarter-finals
Agamenone F.
Zeppieri G.
7-56-4
Moroni G.
Kirkin E.
6-46-3
Halys Q.[1]
De Jong J.
4-66-47-66
Cobolli F.[3]
De Schepper K.
3-67-656-3
Wu Y.
Wolf J.[2]
6-46-1
Uchiyama Y.
Nishioka Y.[1]
3-67-626-1
Shelton B.
Kovacevic A.
7-627-5
Ficovich J.[4]
Fratangelo B.[7]
6-47-65
R16
Zeppieri G.
Draper J.[2]
6-16-4
Cobolli F.[3]
Fabbiano T.
6-46-746-2
Moroni G.
Yevseyev D.
6-06-1
De Jong J.
Arnaldi M.
6-13-66-3
De Schepper K.
Grenier H.[7]
6-36-3
Kirkin E.
Riedi L.
2-66-36-4
Agamenone F.
Eysseric J.
6-42-67-5
Halys Q.[1]
Geerts M.
7-616-3
Fratangelo B.[7]
Habib H.
6-35-76-2
Kovacevic A.
Kirchheimer S.
6-34-66-4
Uchiyama Y.
Hsu Y.
7-646-2
Wolf J.[2]
Mochizuki S.
6-37-61
Wu Y.
Blanch U.
6-36-4
Shelton B.
Rybakov A.
7-646-3
Nishioka Y.[1]
Galarneau A.
6-46-3
Ficovich J.[4]
Quiroz R.
W/O
R32
Zeppieri G.
Napolitano S.
6-26-2
Eysseric J.
Van Assche L.
6-36-4
Agamenone F.
Guinard M.[6]
6-36-2
Fabbiano T.
Caruso S.
7-53-67-5
Grenier H.[7]
Hoang A.
6-34-66-4
Arnaldi M.
Milojevic N.[5]
2-66-46-0
Geerts M.
Pellegrino A.
4-67-656-2
De Jong J.
Kuznetsov A.
6-26-1
De Schepper K.
Celikbilek A.
6-35-76-4
Cobolli F.[3]
Coric B.
4-66-36-4
Draper J.[2]
Skatov T.
6-26-1
Riedi L.
Serdarusic N.
3-67-56-3
Kirkin E.
Stebe C.
6-47-63
Halys Q.[1]
Couacaud E.
7-6106-4
Moroni G.
Simon G.[8]
6-16-4
Yevseyev D.
Giannessi A.
7-653-2
Galarneau A.
Harris B.
6-26-1
Mochizuki S.
Riffice S.
7-627-62
Rybakov A.
Couacaud E.[8]
6-36-5
Uchiyama Y.
Tu L.
6-36-3
Wolf J.[2]
Shang J.
6-16-2
Blanch U.
Mmoh M.[6]
6-31-66-4
Ficovich J.[4]
Mchugh A.
6-26-2
Fratangelo B.[7]
Pervolarakis M.
6-46-0
Kovacevic A.
Young D.
4-66-26-1
Kirchheimer S.
Gomez E.[3]
6-47-61
Hsu Y.
Gojo B.[5]
6-46-4
Nishioka Y.[1]
Kypson P.
6-26-1
Quiroz R.
Smith K.
4-66-16-1
Shelton B.
Nanda G.
4-66-26-3
Habib H.
Hijikata R.
6-726-37-66
Wu Y.
Jaziri M.
6-44-0