Ivan Gakhov vs Sem Verbeek — Amersfoort CH Qualifying Round 1

Amersfoort CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 1
Ivan Gakhov
RUS5
Ivan Gakhov
#388ATP
1430ELO
1384Clay ELO
29 yrs · 191 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 11 July 2022
clay
NED
Sem Verbeek
32 yrs · 193 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWWWLLW
Gakhov I.
7-6 7-6
Verbeek S.
Gakhov I.
77782
Verbeek S.
63660

Ivan Gakhov defeated Sem Verbeek 7-6 7-6 in the Amersfoort CH qualifying round 1 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Gakhov I.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Verbeek S.

Verbeek S.serving63% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Gakhov I.

Serve advantage — Gakhov I.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Gakhov I.Verbeek S.
1st serve in·Even
59%
60%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
70%
59%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
49%
44%
Service points won·Slight edge
62%
53%
Return points won·Even
37%
35%
Break points saved·Slight edge
62%
55%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.9
2.2
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.4
2.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 5). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Gakhov I.
5.0
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Verbeek S.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.8
Surface form
2.9
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
6.9
Minutes 14d
9.2
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Q2
Andreev A.[6]
Cervantes Huegun I.
6-27-62
Fils A.[7]
Nikles J.[1]
6-27-66
Gakhov I.[5]
Pontjodikromo S.
6-25-76-2
Krumich M.[12]
Onclin G.
5-77-56-1
Van Assche L.[3]
Gutierrez O.[8]
7-56-3
Lamasine T.
Mayot H.[9]
7-57-65
Q1
Van Assche L.[3]
Nakagawa N.
3-66-26-4
Fils A.[7]
Nagal S.
6-16-4
Andreev A.[6]
Khoeblal E.
6-36-4
Krumich M.[12]
Stevens B.
6-36-0
Cervantes Huegun I.
Barrientos N.
6-46-1
Pontjodikromo S.
Kravchenko G.[11]
6-27-65
Gakhov I.[5]
Verbeek S.
7-637-66
Onclin G.
Rosenkranz M.[4]
6-47-5
Gutierrez O.[8]
Orlov V.
7-636-4
Mayot H.[9]
Mridha J.
6-46-1
Lamasine T.
Hassan B.[2]
6-36-776-4
Nikles J.[1]
Bellucci T.
6-45-76-1