Tallon Griekspoor vs Ivan Gakhov — Amersfoort CH Semi-final

Amersfoort CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
Tallon Griekspoor
NED1
Tallon Griekspoor
#57ATP
1789ELO
1726Clay ELO
$970kYTD
$8.1MCAREER
30 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWWLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 11 July 2022
clay
Ivan Gakhov
RUS
Ivan Gakhov
#388ATP
1430ELO
1384Clay ELO
29 yrs · 191 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLLLW
Griekspoor T.
6-2 3-6 6-3
Gakhov I.
Griekspoor T.
6362
Gakhov I.
2631

Tallon Griekspoor defeated Ivan Gakhov 6-2 3-6 6-3 in the Amersfoort CH semi-final on clay. The result followed the form book — Tallon Griekspoor came in ranked #57, defending the title.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Griekspoor T.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Gakhov I.

Gakhov I.serving84% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Griekspoor T.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Griekspoor T.Gakhov I.
1st serve in·Slight edge
64%
59%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
75%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
49%
Service points won·Slight edge
67%
62%
Return points won·Even
33%
37%
Break points saved·Even
65%
62%
Aces / match·Dominant
8.6
4.9
Double faults / match·Even
3.2
3.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (198 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Griekspoor T.Gakhov I.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
76
34
Break points saved·Clear edge
99
82
Break points won·Dominant
34
9
Deciding sets·Dominant
94
59
Tiebreaks·Dominant
97
22

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Griekspoor T.
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Gakhov I.
3.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
9.5+341 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
0.5Clay Elo 1384
9.9Overall Elo 1789
ELO gap
0.1Overall Elo 1430
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.5
Surface form
6.8
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
7.5
Minutes 14d
6.9
4.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
9.0
3.0
Surface transition
Context
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Griekspoor T.Gakhov I.
Freshness·
96
—

Griekspoor T.: 14 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Griekspoor T.[1]
Carballes Baena R.[2]
6-16-2
Semi-finals
Carballes Baena R.[2]
Zapata Miralles B.[3]
6-766-46-3
Griekspoor T.[1]
Gakhov I.
6-23-66-3
Quarter-finals
Carballes Baena R.[2]
Van Assche L.
6-36-4
Gakhov I.
Houkes M.
6-26-747-65
Zapata Miralles B.[3]
Daniel T.[5]
6-15-77-63
Griekspoor T.[1]
Sachko V.
6-27-64
R16
Carballes Baena R.[2]
Andreev A.
6-46-4
Daniel T.[5]
Lokoli L.
6-16-2
Gakhov I.
Fils A.
6-36-1
Houkes M.
Taberner C.[4]
6-36-3
Sachko V.
Moraing M.[7]
6-37-66
Griekspoor T.[1]
Piros Z.
6-36-726-3
Van Assche L.
Jong S.
6-06-2
Zapata Miralles B.[3]
Lamasine T.
6-16-2
Van Assche L.
Jong A.
6-06-2
R32
Lamasine T.
Kicker N.
7-645-76-3
Andreev A.
Masur D.
7-656-0
Van Assche L.
Bergs Z.[8]
6-34-66-4
Zapata Miralles B.[3]
Krumich M.
5-76-26-4
Lokoli L.
Gutierrez O.
6-26-1
Fils A.
Travaglia S.[6]
6-46-2
Taberner C.[4]
Haase R.
7-56-746-2
Moraing M.[7]
Kuzmanov D.
6-46-4
Griekspoor T.[1]
Barranco Cosano J.
6-16-2
Jong S.
Mayot H.
6-47-5
Piros Z.
Ritschard A.
6-17-66
Sachko V.
Collarini A.
6-34-66-4
Gakhov I.
Wassermann D.
6-47-63
Daniel T.[5]
Furness E.
6-25-77-63
Carballes Baena R.[2]
Sels J.
6-46-3
Houkes M.
Skatov T.
7-617-64
Jong A.
Mayot H.
6-47-5