Ivan Gakhov vs Arthur Fils — Amersfoort CH Round of 16

Amersfoort CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Ivan Gakhov
RUS
Ivan Gakhov
#388ATP
1430ELO
1384Clay ELO
29 yrs · 191 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 11 July 2022
clay
Arthur Fils
FRA
Arthur Fils
#23ATP
2001ELO
1935Clay ELO
$1.9MYTD
$7.9MCAREER
22 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWWWWW
Gakhov I.
6-3 6-1
Fils A.
Gakhov I.
662
Fils A.
310

Ivan Gakhov defeated Arthur Fils 6-3 6-1 in the Amersfoort CH round of 16 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Arthur Fils came in ranked #23.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Gakhov I.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Fils A.

Fils A.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Gakhov I.

Serve advantage — Fils A.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Gakhov I.Fils A.
—
Serve
75
—
Return
36

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Gakhov I.Fils A.
1st serve in·Even
59%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
74%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
52%
Service points won·Even
62%
65%
Return points won·Even
37%
37%
Break points saved·Even
62%
63%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.9
5.6
Double faults / match·Even
3.4
3.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Gakhov I.Fils A.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
34
89
Break points saved·Clear edge
82
98
Break points won·Dominant
9
70
Deciding sets·Dominant
59
98
Tiebreaks·Dominant
22
99

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Gakhov I.
3.7
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Fils A.
7.7
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
0.0Clay Elo 1384
Surface ELO
10.0+551 Clay Elo edge
0.0Overall Elo 1430
ELO gap
10.0Overall Elo 2001
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.8
Surface form
5.8
Fatigue & Travel
6.9
Minutes 14d
4.9
3-set count
4.0
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Gakhov I.Fils A.
Freshness·
—
93

Fils A.: 12 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Griekspoor T.[1]
Carballes Baena R.[2]
6-16-2
Semi-finals
Carballes Baena R.[2]
Zapata Miralles B.[3]
6-766-46-3
Griekspoor T.[1]
Gakhov I.
6-23-66-3
Quarter-finals
Carballes Baena R.[2]
Van Assche L.
6-36-4
Gakhov I.
Houkes M.
6-26-747-65
Zapata Miralles B.[3]
Daniel T.[5]
6-15-77-63
Griekspoor T.[1]
Sachko V.
6-27-64
R16
Carballes Baena R.[2]
Andreev A.
6-46-4
Daniel T.[5]
Lokoli L.
6-16-2
Gakhov I.
Fils A.
6-36-1
Houkes M.
Taberner C.[4]
6-36-3
Sachko V.
Moraing M.[7]
6-37-66
Griekspoor T.[1]
Piros Z.
6-36-726-3
Van Assche L.
Jong S.
6-06-2
Zapata Miralles B.[3]
Lamasine T.
6-16-2
Van Assche L.
Jong A.
6-06-2
R32
Lamasine T.
Kicker N.
7-645-76-3
Andreev A.
Masur D.
7-656-0
Van Assche L.
Bergs Z.[8]
6-34-66-4
Zapata Miralles B.[3]
Krumich M.
5-76-26-4
Lokoli L.
Gutierrez O.
6-26-1
Fils A.
Travaglia S.[6]
6-46-2
Taberner C.[4]
Haase R.
7-56-746-2
Moraing M.[7]
Kuzmanov D.
6-46-4
Griekspoor T.[1]
Barranco Cosano J.
6-16-2
Jong S.
Mayot H.
6-47-5
Piros Z.
Ritschard A.
6-17-66
Sachko V.
Collarini A.
6-34-66-4
Gakhov I.
Wassermann D.
6-47-63
Daniel T.[5]
Furness E.
6-25-77-63
Carballes Baena R.[2]
Sels J.
6-46-3
Houkes M.
Skatov T.
7-617-64
Jong A.
Mayot H.
6-47-5