Tallon Griekspoor vs Javier Barranco Cosano — Amersfoort CH Round of 32

Amersfoort CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Tallon Griekspoor
NED1
Tallon Griekspoor
#57ATP
1789ELO
1726Clay ELO
$970kYTD
$8.1MCAREER
30 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 11 July 2022
clay
ESP
Javier Barranco Cosano
#433ATP
1457ELO
1441Clay ELO
27 yrs · 180 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWWLLLLW
Griekspoor T.
6-1 6-2
Barranco Cosano J.
Griekspoor T.
662
Barranco Cosano J.
120

Tallon Griekspoor defeated Javier Barranco Cosano 6-1 6-2 in the Amersfoort CH round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Tallon Griekspoor came in ranked #57, defending the title.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Griekspoor T.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Barranco Cosano J.

Barranco Cosano J.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Griekspoor T.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Griekspoor T.Barranco Cosano J.
1st serve in·Even
64%
63%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
75%
64%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
49%
Service points won·Slight edge
67%
59%
Return points won·Slight edge
33%
42%
Break points saved·Slight edge
65%
60%
Aces / match·Dominant
8.6
2.1
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.2
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (198 vs 171). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Griekspoor T.Barranco Cosano J.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
76
14
Break points saved·Dominant
99
70
Break points won·Even
34
33
Deciding sets·Dominant
94
5
Tiebreaks·Dominant
97
7

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Griekspoor T.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Barranco Cosano J.
3.7
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Form & Matchup
8.8+284 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
1.2Clay Elo 1441
9.6Overall Elo 1789
ELO gap
0.4Overall Elo 1457
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.5
Surface form
3.6
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
7.5
Minutes 14d
6.9
4.0
3-set count
7.0
7.0
Prev. match
8.0
3.0
Surface transition
3.0
Context
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Griekspoor T.Barranco Cosano J.
Freshness·
96
—

Griekspoor T.: 14 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Griekspoor T.[1]
Carballes Baena R.[2]
6-16-2
Semi-finals
Carballes Baena R.[2]
Zapata Miralles B.[3]
6-766-46-3
Griekspoor T.[1]
Gakhov I.
6-23-66-3
Quarter-finals
Carballes Baena R.[2]
Van Assche L.
6-36-4
Gakhov I.
Houkes M.
6-26-747-65
Zapata Miralles B.[3]
Daniel T.[5]
6-15-77-63
Griekspoor T.[1]
Sachko V.
6-27-64
R16
Carballes Baena R.[2]
Andreev A.
6-46-4
Daniel T.[5]
Lokoli L.
6-16-2
Gakhov I.
Fils A.
6-36-1
Houkes M.
Taberner C.[4]
6-36-3
Sachko V.
Moraing M.[7]
6-37-66
Griekspoor T.[1]
Piros Z.
6-36-726-3
Van Assche L.
Jong S.
6-06-2
Zapata Miralles B.[3]
Lamasine T.
6-16-2
Van Assche L.
Jong A.
6-06-2
R32
Lamasine T.
Kicker N.
7-645-76-3
Andreev A.
Masur D.
7-656-0
Van Assche L.
Bergs Z.[8]
6-34-66-4
Zapata Miralles B.[3]
Krumich M.
5-76-26-4
Lokoli L.
Gutierrez O.
6-26-1
Fils A.
Travaglia S.[6]
6-46-2
Taberner C.[4]
Haase R.
7-56-746-2
Moraing M.[7]
Kuzmanov D.
6-46-4
Griekspoor T.[1]
Barranco Cosano J.
6-16-2
Jong S.
Mayot H.
6-47-5
Piros Z.
Ritschard A.
6-17-66
Sachko V.
Collarini A.
6-34-66-4
Gakhov I.
Wassermann D.
6-47-63
Daniel T.[5]
Furness E.
6-25-77-63
Carballes Baena R.[2]
Sels J.
6-46-3
Houkes M.
Skatov T.
7-617-64
Jong A.
Mayot H.
6-47-5