Marius Copil vs Oleg Prihodko — Iasi CH Round of 32

Iasi CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
ROU
Marius Copil
35 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 11 July 2022
clay
Oleg Prihodko
UKR
Oleg Prihodko
#400ATP
1395ELO
1332Clay ELO
28 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWWLLWWL
Copil M.
6-2 7-6
Prihodko O.
Copil M.
6772
Prihodko O.
2630

Marius Copil defeated Oleg Prihodko 6-2 7-6 in the Iasi CH round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Marius Copil came in defending last year's round of 16.

Key context

  • Match story: Marius Copil closed it out in two sets, 6–2 7–6.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Copil M.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Prihodko O.

Prihodko O.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Copil M.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Copil M.Prihodko O.
1st serve in·Slight edge
59%
66%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
75%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
50%
Service points won·Even
66%
62%
Return points won·Even
35%
38%
Break points saved·Even
62%
60%
Aces / match·Dominant
8.4
4.5
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.0
2.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (114 vs 126). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Copil M.Prihodko O.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
47
17
Break points saved·Clear edge
91
68
Break points won·Even
3
2
Deciding sets·Dominant
63
14
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
79
64

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Copil M.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Prihodko O.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.4
Surface form
5.4
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
7.8
Minutes 14d
7.3
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Copil M.Prihodko O.
Freshness·
—
68

Prihodko O.: 1 day rest · 3 matches, 53 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Meligeni Alves F.[8]
Andujar P.[2]
6-34-66-2
Semi-finals
Andujar P.[2]
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
3-66-26-3
Meligeni Alves F.[8]
Darderi L.
6-26-2
Quarter-finals
Darderi L.
Lehecka J.[1]
4-67-616-4
Andujar P.[2]
Klein L.
6-36-4
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
Blancaneaux G.[5]
6-46-4
Meligeni Alves F.[8]
Ferreira Silva F.
6-47-65
R16
Ferreira Silva F.
Copil M.
7-647-62
Klein L.
Krutykh O.
6-36-4
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
De Loore J.
6-36-756-4
Darderi L.
Svrcina D.[6]
5-77-57-66
Andujar P.[2]
Wessels L.
6-26-4
Blancaneaux G.[5]
Ionel N.
6-16-2
Meligeni Alves F.[8]
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
6-26-4
Lehecka J.[1]
Chepelev A.
6-44-66-4
R32
Ionel N.
Coric B.
6-46-2
Krutykh O.
Dutra Da Silva D.
2-67-647-63
Klein L.
Olivo R.[7]
6-33-66-4
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
Shevchenko A.[4]
6-16-4
Blancaneaux G.[5]
Jianu F.
6-27-5
Meligeni Alves F.[8]
Pereira J.
7-51-66-1
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
Arnaldi M.
6-26-3
Lehecka J.[1]
Snitari I.
6-47-65
De Loore J.
Palosi S.
6-26-2
Wessels L.
Cretu C.
6-46-2
Copil M.
Prihodko O.
6-27-63
Andujar P.[2]
Alvarez Varona N.
6-46-4
Darderi L.
Frunza N.
6-17-5
Svrcina D.[6]
Miedler L.
6-43-66-2
Ferreira Silva F.
Kolar Z.[3]
6-44-4
Chepelev A.
Seyboth Wild T.
6-22-64-0