Roberto Carballes Baena vs Jelle Sels — Amersfoort CH Round of 32

Amersfoort CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Roberto Carballes Baena
ESP2
Roberto Carballes Baena
#163ATP
1632ELO
1612Clay ELO
$188kYTD
$6.3MCAREER
33 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 11 July 2022
clay
NED
Jelle Sels
#490ATP
1313ELO
1283Clay ELO
30 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLWLLW
Carballes Baena R.
6-4 6-3
Sels J.
Carballes Baena R.
662
Sels J.
430

Roberto Carballes Baena defeated Jelle Sels 6-4 6-3 in the Amersfoort CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Carballes Baena R.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Sels J.

Sels J.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Carballes Baena R.

Serve advantage — Carballes Baena R.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Carballes Baena R.Sels J.
1st serve in·Even
64%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
67%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
50%
Service points won·Even
61%
61%
Return points won·Even
39%
37%
Break points saved·Even
60%
60%
Aces / match·Slight edge
2.8
4.2
Double faults / match·Even
2.3
2.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Carballes Baena R.Sels J.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
61
15
Break points saved·Dominant
93
61
Break points won·Dominant
58
4
Deciding sets·Clear edge
64
40
Tiebreaks·Dominant
51
11

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Carballes Baena R.
6.8
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Sels J.
5.1
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
9.0+329 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
1.0Clay Elo 1283
8.8Overall Elo 1632
ELO gap
1.2Overall Elo 1313
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.5
Surface form
4.2
Fatigue & Travel
6.1
Minutes 14d
7.5
4.0
3-set count
4.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
7.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Carballes Baena R.Sels J.
Freshness·Even
100
100

Carballes Baena R.: 18 days rest · Sels J.: 18 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Griekspoor T.[1]
Carballes Baena R.[2]
6-16-2
Semi-finals
Carballes Baena R.[2]
Zapata Miralles B.[3]
6-766-46-3
Griekspoor T.[1]
Gakhov I.
6-23-66-3
Quarter-finals
Carballes Baena R.[2]
Van Assche L.
6-36-4
Gakhov I.
Houkes M.
6-26-747-65
Zapata Miralles B.[3]
Daniel T.[5]
6-15-77-63
Griekspoor T.[1]
Sachko V.
6-27-64
R16
Carballes Baena R.[2]
Andreev A.
6-46-4
Daniel T.[5]
Lokoli L.
6-16-2
Gakhov I.
Fils A.
6-36-1
Houkes M.
Taberner C.[4]
6-36-3
Sachko V.
Moraing M.[7]
6-37-66
Griekspoor T.[1]
Piros Z.
6-36-726-3
Van Assche L.
Jong S.
6-06-2
Zapata Miralles B.[3]
Lamasine T.
6-16-2
Van Assche L.
Jong A.
6-06-2
R32
Lamasine T.
Kicker N.
7-645-76-3
Andreev A.
Masur D.
7-656-0
Van Assche L.
Bergs Z.[8]
6-34-66-4
Zapata Miralles B.[3]
Krumich M.
5-76-26-4
Lokoli L.
Gutierrez O.
6-26-1
Fils A.
Travaglia S.[6]
6-46-2
Taberner C.[4]
Haase R.
7-56-746-2
Moraing M.[7]
Kuzmanov D.
6-46-4
Griekspoor T.[1]
Barranco Cosano J.
6-16-2
Jong S.
Mayot H.
6-47-5
Piros Z.
Ritschard A.
6-17-66
Sachko V.
Collarini A.
6-34-66-4
Gakhov I.
Wassermann D.
6-47-63
Daniel T.[5]
Furness E.
6-25-77-63
Carballes Baena R.[2]
Sels J.
6-46-3
Houkes M.
Skatov T.
7-617-64
Jong A.
Mayot H.
6-47-5