Luca Van Assche vs Zizou Bergs — Amersfoort CH Round of 32

Amersfoort CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Luca Van Assche
FRA
Luca Van Assche
#86ATP
1701ELO
1639Clay ELO
$411kYTD
$2.6MCAREER
22 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWWWWWLWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 11 July 2022
clay
Zizou Bergs
BEL8
Zizou Bergs
#35ATP
1808ELO
1696Clay ELO
$995kYTD
$4.0MCAREER
27 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWWWLL
Van Assche L.
6-3 4-6 6-4
Bergs Z.
Van Assche L.
6462
Bergs Z.
3641

Luca Van Assche defeated Zizou Bergs 6-3 4-6 6-4 in the Amersfoort CH round of 32 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Zizou Bergs came in ranked #35, defending last year's round of 32. Luca Van Assche extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

  • Match story: Luca Van Assche closed it out in three sets, 6–3 4–6 6–4.

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2024-04-22Madrid MastersR128clayLuca Van Assche6-4 6-7(0) 6-1

Serve vs return

This season
Van Assche L.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Bergs Z.

Bergs Z.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Van Assche L.

Serve advantage — Bergs Z.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Van Assche L.Bergs Z.
1st serve in·Even
63%
61%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
68%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
52%
Service points won·Even
61%
65%
Return points won·Even
40%
38%
Break points saved·Even
60%
61%
Aces / match·Dominant
3.4
6.7
Double faults / match·Even
3.3
3.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Van Assche L.Bergs Z.
Clutch Rating·Even
67
69
Break points saved·Even
91
95
Break points won·Dominant
61
21
Deciding sets·Clear edge
79
92
Tiebreaks·Dominant
51
91

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Van Assche L.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry Score
Bergs Z.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry Score
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Form & Matchup
3.9Clay Elo 1639
Surface ELO
6.1+58 Clay Elo edge
3.8Overall Elo 1701
ELO gap
6.2Overall Elo 1808
5.0
H2H
5.0
6.7
Surface form
6.5
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
4.7
Minutes 14d
8.6
0.0
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
7.0
Surface transition
3.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Van Assche L.Bergs Z.
Freshness·Slight edge
77
82

Van Assche L.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 30 games (7d) · Bergs Z.: 10 days rest · 3 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Griekspoor T.[1]
Carballes Baena R.[2]
6-16-2
Semi-finals
Carballes Baena R.[2]
Zapata Miralles B.[3]
6-766-46-3
Griekspoor T.[1]
Gakhov I.
6-23-66-3
Quarter-finals
Carballes Baena R.[2]
Van Assche L.
6-36-4
Gakhov I.
Houkes M.
6-26-747-65
Zapata Miralles B.[3]
Daniel T.[5]
6-15-77-63
Griekspoor T.[1]
Sachko V.
6-27-64
R16
Carballes Baena R.[2]
Andreev A.
6-46-4
Daniel T.[5]
Lokoli L.
6-16-2
Gakhov I.
Fils A.
6-36-1
Houkes M.
Taberner C.[4]
6-36-3
Sachko V.
Moraing M.[7]
6-37-66
Griekspoor T.[1]
Piros Z.
6-36-726-3
Van Assche L.
Jong S.
6-06-2
Zapata Miralles B.[3]
Lamasine T.
6-16-2
Van Assche L.
Jong A.
6-06-2
R32
Lamasine T.
Kicker N.
7-645-76-3
Andreev A.
Masur D.
7-656-0
Van Assche L.
Bergs Z.[8]
6-34-66-4
Zapata Miralles B.[3]
Krumich M.
5-76-26-4
Lokoli L.
Gutierrez O.
6-26-1
Fils A.
Travaglia S.[6]
6-46-2
Taberner C.[4]
Haase R.
7-56-746-2
Moraing M.[7]
Kuzmanov D.
6-46-4
Griekspoor T.[1]
Barranco Cosano J.
6-16-2
Jong S.
Mayot H.
6-47-5
Piros Z.
Ritschard A.
6-17-66
Sachko V.
Collarini A.
6-34-66-4
Gakhov I.
Wassermann D.
6-47-63
Daniel T.[5]
Furness E.
6-25-77-63
Carballes Baena R.[2]
Sels J.
6-46-3
Houkes M.
Skatov T.
7-617-64
Jong A.
Mayot H.
6-47-5