Roberto Carballes Baena vs Luca Van Assche — Amersfoort CH Quarter-final

Amersfoort CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Roberto Carballes Baena
ESP2
Roberto Carballes Baena
#163ATP
1632ELO
1612Clay ELO
$188kYTD
$6.3MCAREER
33 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 11 July 2022
clay
Luca Van Assche
FRA
Luca Van Assche
#80ATP
1701ELO
1639Clay ELO
$411kYTD
$2.6MCAREER
22 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWLWLW
Carballes Baena R.
6-3 6-4
Van Assche L.
Carballes Baena R.
662
Van Assche L.
340

Roberto Carballes Baena defeated Luca Van Assche 6-3 6-4 in the Amersfoort CH quarter-final on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Luca Van Assche came in ranked #80. Roberto Carballes Baena extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2021-11-01Paris MastersQ1hardRoberto Carballes Baena6-2 7-6(3)

Serve vs return

This season
Carballes Baena R.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Van Assche L.

Van Assche L.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Carballes Baena R.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Carballes Baena R.Van Assche L.
1st serve in·Even
64%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
67%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
50%
Service points won·Even
61%
61%
Return points won·Even
39%
40%
Break points saved·Even
60%
60%
Aces / match·Slight edge
2.8
3.4
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.3
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Carballes Baena R.Van Assche L.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
61
67
Break points saved·Even
93
91
Break points won·Even
58
61
Deciding sets·Clear edge
64
79
Tiebreaks·Even
51
51

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Carballes Baena R.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Van Assche L.
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
4.8Clay Elo 1612
Surface ELO
5.2+26 Clay Elo edge
4.0Overall Elo 1632
ELO gap
6.0Overall Elo 1701
5.0
H2H
5.0
4.5
Surface form
6.7
Fatigue & Travel
6.1
Minutes 14d
4.7
4.0
3-set count
0.0
4.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Carballes Baena R.Van Assche L.
Freshness·Even
100
99

Carballes Baena R.: 18 days rest · Van Assche L.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Griekspoor T.[1]
Carballes Baena R.[2]
6-16-2
Semi-finals
Carballes Baena R.[2]
Zapata Miralles B.[3]
6-766-46-3
Griekspoor T.[1]
Gakhov I.
6-23-66-3
Quarter-finals
Carballes Baena R.[2]
Van Assche L.
6-36-4
Gakhov I.
Houkes M.
6-26-747-65
Zapata Miralles B.[3]
Daniel T.[5]
6-15-77-63
Griekspoor T.[1]
Sachko V.
6-27-64
R16
Carballes Baena R.[2]
Andreev A.
6-46-4
Daniel T.[5]
Lokoli L.
6-16-2
Gakhov I.
Fils A.
6-36-1
Houkes M.
Taberner C.[4]
6-36-3
Sachko V.
Moraing M.[7]
6-37-66
Griekspoor T.[1]
Piros Z.
6-36-726-3
Van Assche L.
Jong S.
6-06-2
Zapata Miralles B.[3]
Lamasine T.
6-16-2
Van Assche L.
Jong A.
6-06-2
R32
Lamasine T.
Kicker N.
7-645-76-3
Andreev A.
Masur D.
7-656-0
Van Assche L.
Bergs Z.[8]
6-34-66-4
Zapata Miralles B.[3]
Krumich M.
5-76-26-4
Lokoli L.
Gutierrez O.
6-26-1
Fils A.
Travaglia S.[6]
6-46-2
Taberner C.[4]
Haase R.
7-56-746-2
Moraing M.[7]
Kuzmanov D.
6-46-4
Griekspoor T.[1]
Barranco Cosano J.
6-16-2
Jong S.
Mayot H.
6-47-5
Piros Z.
Ritschard A.
6-17-66
Sachko V.
Collarini A.
6-34-66-4
Gakhov I.
Wassermann D.
6-47-63
Daniel T.[5]
Furness E.
6-25-77-63
Carballes Baena R.[2]
Sels J.
6-46-3
Houkes M.
Skatov T.
7-617-64
Jong A.
Mayot H.
6-47-5