Roberto Carballes Baena vs Adrian Andreev — Amersfoort CH Round of 16

Amersfoort CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Roberto Carballes Baena
ESP2
Roberto Carballes Baena
#163ATP
1632ELO
1612Clay ELO
$188kYTD
$6.3MCAREER
33 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 11 July 2022
clay
BUL
Adrian Andreev
#1122ATP
25 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLLL
Carballes Baena R.
6-4 6-4
Andreev A.
Carballes Baena R.
662
Andreev A.
440

Roberto Carballes Baena defeated Adrian Andreev 6-4 6-4 in the Amersfoort CH round of 16 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Carballes Baena R.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Andreev A.

Andreev A.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Carballes Baena R.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Carballes Baena R.Andreev A.
1st serve in·Even
64%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
67%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
50%
Service points won·Even
61%
60%
Return points won·Even
39%
40%
Break points saved·Even
60%
58%
Aces / match·Even
2.8
3.0
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.3
1.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 198). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Carballes Baena R.Andreev A.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
61
37
Break points saved·Dominant
93
53
Break points won·Dominant
58
14
Deciding sets·Slight edge
64
55
Tiebreaks·Dominant
51
94

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Carballes Baena R.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Andreev A.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
10.0No prior meetings
H2H
0.0
4.5
Surface form
5.2
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
6.1
Minutes 14d
4.0
4.0
3-set count
0.0
4.0
Prev. match
4.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Carballes Baena R.Andreev A.
Freshness·
100
—

Carballes Baena R.: 17 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Griekspoor T.[1]
Carballes Baena R.[2]
6-16-2
Semi-finals
Carballes Baena R.[2]
Zapata Miralles B.[3]
6-766-46-3
Griekspoor T.[1]
Gakhov I.
6-23-66-3
Quarter-finals
Carballes Baena R.[2]
Van Assche L.
6-36-4
Gakhov I.
Houkes M.
6-26-747-65
Zapata Miralles B.[3]
Daniel T.[5]
6-15-77-63
Griekspoor T.[1]
Sachko V.
6-27-64
R16
Carballes Baena R.[2]
Andreev A.
6-46-4
Daniel T.[5]
Lokoli L.
6-16-2
Gakhov I.
Fils A.
6-36-1
Houkes M.
Taberner C.[4]
6-36-3
Sachko V.
Moraing M.[7]
6-37-66
Griekspoor T.[1]
Piros Z.
6-36-726-3
Van Assche L.
Jong S.
6-06-2
Zapata Miralles B.[3]
Lamasine T.
6-16-2
Van Assche L.
Jong A.
6-06-2
R32
Lamasine T.
Kicker N.
7-645-76-3
Andreev A.
Masur D.
7-656-0
Van Assche L.
Bergs Z.[8]
6-34-66-4
Zapata Miralles B.[3]
Krumich M.
5-76-26-4
Lokoli L.
Gutierrez O.
6-26-1
Fils A.
Travaglia S.[6]
6-46-2
Taberner C.[4]
Haase R.
7-56-746-2
Moraing M.[7]
Kuzmanov D.
6-46-4
Griekspoor T.[1]
Barranco Cosano J.
6-16-2
Jong S.
Mayot H.
6-47-5
Piros Z.
Ritschard A.
6-17-66
Sachko V.
Collarini A.
6-34-66-4
Gakhov I.
Wassermann D.
6-47-63
Daniel T.[5]
Furness E.
6-25-77-63
Carballes Baena R.[2]
Sels J.
6-46-3
Houkes M.
Skatov T.
7-617-64
Jong A.
Mayot H.
6-47-5