Giulio Zeppieri vs Fernando Verdasco — Salzburg CH Round of 32

Salzburg CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Giulio Zeppieri
ITA
Giulio Zeppieri
#218ATP
1622ELO
1566Clay ELO
$70kYTD
$1.4MCAREER
24 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWLLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 4 July 2022
clay
ESP8
Fernando Verdasco
42 yrs · 188 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWWLLLL
Zeppieri G.
6-1 1-6 7-6
Verdasco F.
Zeppieri G.
61772
Verdasco F.
16651

Giulio Zeppieri defeated Fernando Verdasco 6-1 1-6 7-6 in the Salzburg CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Giulio Zeppieri came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 6–1 1–6 7–6.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Zeppieri G.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Verdasco F.

Verdasco F.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Zeppieri G.

Serve advantage — Zeppieri G.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Zeppieri G.Verdasco F.
1st serve in·Even
62%
64%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
73%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
49%
Service points won·Even
65%
61%
Return points won·Even
37%
38%
Break points saved·Slight edge
65%
59%
Aces / match·Dominant
6.8
3.3
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.4
3.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 87). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Zeppieri G.Verdasco F.
Clutch Rating·Even
55
57
Break points saved·Even
95
96
Break points won·Even
39
40
Deciding sets·Even
68
65
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
43
54

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Zeppieri G.
5.4
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Verdasco F.
4.9
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.7
Surface form
4.9
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
8.7
Minutes 14d
7.3
7.0
3-set count
7.0
7.0
Prev. match
8.0
3.0
Surface transition
3.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Monteiro T.[6]
Gombos N.
6-37-62
Semi-finals
Monteiro T.[6]
Bagnis F.[7]
3-67-56-3
Gombos N.
Moutet C.
3-67-56-3
Quarter-finals
Monteiro T.[6]
Lajovic D.[2]
6-46-726-4
Bagnis F.[7]
Neuchrist M.
6-26-746-2
Moutet C.
Neumayer L.
6-26-2
Gombos N.
Martin Tiffon P.
6-36-1
R16
Bagnis F.[7]
Thiem D.
6-32-66-4
Lajovic D.[2]
Novak D.
6-46-4
Monteiro T.[6]
Shevchenko A.
6-47-64
Neuchrist M.
Carballes Baena R.[4]
6-756-37-612
Gombos N.
Zeppieri G.
7-57-60
Martin Tiffon P.
Lehecka J.[3]
6-46-4
Moutet C.
Ymer M.[5]
7-626-3
Neumayer L.
Rinderknech A.[1]
7-56-3
R32
Novak D.
Gakhov I.
6-27-5
Shevchenko A.
Guinard M.
6-26-3
Monteiro T.[6]
Rodionov J.
3-66-36-2
Carballes Baena R.[4]
Medjedovic H.
6-46-1
Neuchrist M.
Kolar Z.
7-656-3
Thiem D.
Misolic F.
6-47-5
Gombos N.
Nardi L.
5-77-56-2
Martin Tiffon P.
Miedler L.
6-43-66-0
Ymer M.[5]
Arnaboldi A.
6-46-1
Moutet C.
Ymer E.
6-46-3
Neumayer L.
Simon G.
6-26-4
Rinderknech A.[1]
Sachko V.
6-16-3
Lehecka J.[3]
Ofner S.
6-34-66-4
Lajovic D.[2]
Svrcina D.
7-56-1
Zeppieri G.
Verdasco F.[8]
6-11-67-65
Bagnis F.[7]
Diaz Acosta F.
6-20-0