Dominic Thiem vs Filip Misolic — Salzburg CH Round of 32

Salzburg CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
AUT
Dominic Thiem
32 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 4 July 2022
clay
Filip Misolic
AUT
Filip Misolic
#293ATP
1587ELO
1664Clay ELO
$111kYTD
$1.2MCAREER
24 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWWLLL
Thiem D.
6-4 7-5
Misolic F.
Thiem D.
672
Misolic F.
450

Dominic Thiem defeated Filip Misolic 6-4 7-5 in the Salzburg CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Thiem D.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Misolic F.

Misolic F.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Thiem D.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Thiem D.Misolic F.
1st serve in·Even
62%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
50%
Service points won·Even
63%
61%
Return points won·Even
35%
39%
Break points saved·Even
60%
61%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.7
3.3
Double faults / match·Even
2.6
2.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (117 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Thiem D.Misolic F.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
85
79
Break points saved·Slight edge
98
91
Break points won·Slight edge
58
53
Deciding sets·Slight edge
99
94
Tiebreaks·Even
97
97

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Thiem D.
3.9
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 42 days (−0.7)
Misolic F.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
0.6
Surface form
8.6
0.0Lost last 9
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
9.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
8.0
Surface transition
3.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Monteiro T.[6]
Gombos N.
6-37-62
Semi-finals
Monteiro T.[6]
Bagnis F.[7]
3-67-56-3
Gombos N.
Moutet C.
3-67-56-3
Quarter-finals
Monteiro T.[6]
Lajovic D.[2]
6-46-726-4
Bagnis F.[7]
Neuchrist M.
6-26-746-2
Moutet C.
Neumayer L.
6-26-2
Gombos N.
Martin Tiffon P.
6-36-1
R16
Bagnis F.[7]
Thiem D.
6-32-66-4
Lajovic D.[2]
Novak D.
6-46-4
Monteiro T.[6]
Shevchenko A.
6-47-64
Neuchrist M.
Carballes Baena R.[4]
6-756-37-612
Gombos N.
Zeppieri G.
7-57-60
Martin Tiffon P.
Lehecka J.[3]
6-46-4
Moutet C.
Ymer M.[5]
7-626-3
Neumayer L.
Rinderknech A.[1]
7-56-3
R32
Novak D.
Gakhov I.
6-27-5
Shevchenko A.
Guinard M.
6-26-3
Monteiro T.[6]
Rodionov J.
3-66-36-2
Carballes Baena R.[4]
Medjedovic H.
6-46-1
Neuchrist M.
Kolar Z.
7-656-3
Thiem D.
Misolic F.
6-47-5
Gombos N.
Nardi L.
5-77-56-2
Martin Tiffon P.
Miedler L.
6-43-66-0
Ymer M.[5]
Arnaboldi A.
6-46-1
Moutet C.
Ymer E.
6-46-3
Neumayer L.
Simon G.
6-26-4
Rinderknech A.[1]
Sachko V.
6-16-3
Lehecka J.[3]
Ofner S.
6-34-66-4
Lajovic D.[2]
Svrcina D.
7-56-1
Zeppieri G.
Verdasco F.[8]
6-11-67-65
Bagnis F.[7]
Diaz Acosta F.
6-20-0