Nicolas Kicker vs Daniel Masur — Todi CH Semi-final

Todi CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
Nicolas Kicker
ARG
Nicolas Kicker
#322ATP
1385ELO
1373Clay ELO
33 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWLWWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 4 July 2022
clay
Daniel Masur
GER
Daniel Masur
#386ATP
1413ELO
1387Clay ELO
31 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLLLWW
Kicker N.
6-2 3-6 6-4
Masur D.
Kicker N.
6362
Masur D.
2641

Nicolas Kicker defeated Daniel Masur 6-2 3-6 6-4 in the Todi CH semi-final on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Nicolas Kicker closed it out in three sets, 6–2 3–6 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Kicker N.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Masur D.

Masur D.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Kicker N.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Kicker N.Masur D.
1st serve in·Slight edge
68%
63%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
64%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
49%
Service points won·Even
59%
63%
Return points won·Slight edge
42%
37%
Break points saved·Even
58%
58%
Aces / match·Dominant
1.1
5.4
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.9
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (170 vs 179). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Kicker N.Masur D.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
30
10
Break points saved·Clear edge
56
73
Break points won·Dominant
45
5
Deciding sets·Clear edge
30
15
Tiebreaks·Dominant
51
13

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Kicker N.
4.6
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Masur D.
3.6
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Form & Matchup
4.4Clay Elo 1373
Surface ELO
5.6+14 Clay Elo edge
4.2Overall Elo 1385
ELO gap
5.8Overall Elo 1413
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.3
Surface form
4.1
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
6.0
Minutes 14d
5.9
7.0
3-set count
0.0
9.0
Prev. match
3.0
Surface transition
3.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Kicker N.Masur D.
Freshness·Even
100
100

Kicker N.: 18 days rest · Masur D.: 15 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Cachin P.[1]
Kicker N.
6-46-4
Semi-finals
Cachin P.[1]
Passaro F.
6-776-26-1
Kicker N.
Masur D.
6-23-66-4
Quarter-finals
Masur D.
Maestrelli F.
6-26-3
Passaro F.
Darderi L.
6-736-36-4
Kicker N.
Cobolli F.[2]
6-36-3
Cachin P.[1]
Rodriguez Taverna S.[5]
6-36-2
R16
Rodriguez Taverna S.[5]
Dutra Da Silva D.
6-24-66-2
Cobolli F.[2]
Sels J.
6-46-4
Kicker N.
Skatov T.
6-46-3
Maestrelli F.
Torres J.
6-757-626-2
Masur D.
Tirante T.[7]
6-46-1
Darderi L.
Fonio G.
6-37-63
Cachin P.[1]
Gigante M.
7-646-0
Passaro F.
Serdarusic N.[4]
6-47-61
R32
Kicker N.
De Jong J.
3-67-51-0
Serdarusic N.[4]
Ajdukovic D.
6-44-63-2
Gigante M.
Gaio F.
6-37-5
Cobolli F.[2]
Collarini A.
6-36-3
Sels J.
Arnaldi M.
6-36-4
Skatov T.
Horansky F.[6]
5-76-36-1
Torres J.
Furness E.
4-66-36-2
Masur D.
Bellucci M.
6-36-756-2
Tirante T.[7]
Chepelev A.
4-66-36-2
Fonio G.
Popko D.[8]
6-43-66-1
Rodriguez Taverna S.[5]
Bertola R.
5-76-36-4
Cachin P.[1]
Klein L.
6-27-64
Dutra Da Silva D.
Harris B.
6-34-66-1
Maestrelli F.
Muller A.[3]
3-67-626-1
Passaro F.
De Loore J.
2-66-46-1
Darderi L.
Moroni G.
6-47-5