Facundo Juarez vs Naoki Nakagawa — Bogota CH Round of 32

Bogota CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
ITA
Facundo Juarez
#809ATP
28 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLWWLWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 4 July 2022
clay
JPN
Naoki Nakagawa
#776ATP
1289ELO
1149Clay ELO
29 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWWLWLL
Juarez F.
7-5 1-6 6-1
Nakagawa N.
Juarez F.
7162
Nakagawa N.
5611

Facundo Juarez defeated Naoki Nakagawa 7-5 1-6 6-1 in the Bogota CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Facundo Juarez came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 7–5 1–6 6–1.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Juarez F.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Nakagawa N.

Nakagawa N.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Juarez F.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Juarez F.Nakagawa N.
1st serve in·Clear edge
74%
55%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
62%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
51%
Service points won·Even
59%
62%
Return points won·Slight edge
42%
37%
Break points saved·Even
57%
61%
Aces / match·Dominant
0.8
6.0
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.9
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (81 vs 122). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Juarez F.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Nakagawa N.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
0.0No prior meetings
H2H
10.0
4.4
Surface form
4.1
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
6.3
Minutes 14d
6.2
7.0
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Ficovich J.[2]
Melzer G.[5]
6-16-2
Semi-finals
Ficovich J.[2]
Hardt N.
6-12-66-2
Melzer G.[5]
Zekic M.[7]
6-12-66-4
Quarter-finals
Ficovich J.[2]
Quiroz R.
6-33-66-3
Zekic M.[7]
Meligeni Alves F.[3]
2-66-36-4
Hardt N.
Juarez F.
7-56-3
Melzer G.[5]
Alvarez N.
3-66-37-5
R16
Quiroz R.
Villanueva G.[8]
7-56-4
Melzer G.[5]
Zhu E.
7-637-5
Ficovich J.[2]
Mejia N.
7-636-4
Zekic M.[7]
Jaziri M.
3-66-37-63
Hardt N.
Huertas Del Pino A.
6-06-3
Alvarez N.
Mena F.[1]
6-46-756-1
Juarez F.
Monzon I.
6-34-66-4
Meligeni Alves F.[3]
Durasovic V.
6-26-3
R32
Mejia N.
Smith K.
7-627-64
Quiroz R.
Pervolarakis M.
6-37-5
Villanueva G.[8]
Urrea A.
6-46-1
Huertas Del Pino A.
Oliveira G.
6-26-3
Zekic M.[7]
Alves M.
5-77-57-5
Durasovic V.
Mukund S.
6-786-26-2
Melzer G.[5]
Menendez Maceiras A.
7-50-66-3
Zhu E.
Zukas M.
6-42-66-3
Mena F.[1]
Krstin P.
7-646-2
Monzon I.
Lama G.[6]
6-37-5
Jaziri M.
Buitrago N.
5-76-26-4
Juarez F.
Nakagawa N.
7-51-66-1
Meligeni Alves F.[3]
Baker B.
6-46-1
Ficovich J.[2]
Hernandez Ramirez S.
6-24-66-3
Alvarez N.
Burruchaga R.
7-644-66-2
Hardt N.
Kovacevic A.
6-36-2