Christopher Oconnell vs Omar Jasika — Porto CH Round of 32

Porto CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
AUS3
Christopher Oconnell
1673ELO
1657Hard ELO
32 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 4 July 2022
hard
AUS
Omar Jasika
#528ATP
1296ELO
1272Hard ELO
29 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWLLL
Oconnell C.
6-2 6-4
Jasika O.
Oconnell C.
662
Jasika O.
240

Christopher Oconnell defeated Omar Jasika 6-2 6-4 in the Porto CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Oconnell C.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Jasika O.

Jasika O.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Oconnell C.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Oconnell C.Jasika O.
20
Serve
—
32
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Oconnell C.Jasika O.
1st serve in·Slight edge
61%
69%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
73%
64%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
49%
Service points won·Slight edge
64%
59%
Return points won·Even
35%
39%
Break points saved·Slight edge
63%
57%
Aces / match·Dominant
7.1
2.2
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.7
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 177). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Oconnell C.Jasika O.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
49
0
Break points saved·Dominant
98
47
Break points won·Slight edge
22
13
Deciding sets·Dominant
38
13
Tiebreaks·Dominant
93
1

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Oconnell C.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Jasika O.
4.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
9.4+385 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
0.6Hard Elo 1272
9.3Overall Elo 1673
ELO gap
0.7Overall Elo 1296
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.1
Surface form
3.4
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
7.0
3-set count
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Celikbilek A.
Oconnell C.[3]
7-653-1
Semi-finals
Oconnell C.[3]
Nishioka Y.[2]
6-36-3
Celikbilek A.
Duckworth J.[1]
7-656-4
Quarter-finals
Oconnell C.[3]
Uchida K.
6-46-2
Celikbilek A.
Gerasimov E.[6]
7-56-4
Duckworth J.[1]
Mchugh A.
7-636-0
Nishioka Y.[2]
Grenier H.[5]
2-66-24-0
R16
Nishioka Y.[2]
Nava E.
7-626-3
Grenier H.[5]
Rodrigues D.
6-46-2
Uchida K.
De Schepper K.
7-56-3
Gerasimov E.[6]
Donskoy E.
6-36-776-2
Celikbilek A.
Escoffier A.
6-26-3
Mchugh A.
Ferreira Silva F.
7-656-1
Duckworth J.[1]
Bellier A.
6-26-1
Oconnell C.[3]
Barrere G.
6-36-1
R32
Ferreira Silva F.
Lestienne C.[7]
7-52-1
Nishioka Y.[2]
Kuznetsov A.
7-657-5
Nava E.
Bellucci T.
6-46-3
Gerasimov E.[6]
Decamps G.
6-736-46-1
Donskoy E.
Uchiyama Y.
7-56-4
Celikbilek A.
Olivo R.
6-36-3
Escoffier A.
Borges N.[4]
7-656-4
Mchugh A.
Basic M.
3-66-46-3
Duckworth J.[1]
Araujo P.
6-36-4
Grenier H.[5]
Sousa P.
6-37-5
De Schepper K.
Blanch U.
6-46-4
Bellier A.
Jung J.
6-32-66-4
Oconnell C.[3]
Jasika O.
6-26-4
Barrere G.
Domingues J.
5-77-626-1
Rodrigues D.
Moriya H.
6-46-2
Uchida K.
Marchenko I.
7-637-63