Matteo Gigante vs Federico Gaio — Todi CH Round of 32

Todi CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Matteo Gigante
ITA
Matteo Gigante
#526ATP
1592ELO
1598Clay ELO
24 yrs · 180 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 4 July 2022
clay
ITA
Federico Gaio
34 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWWLWLLL
Gigante M.
6-3 7-5
Gaio F.
Gigante M.
672
Gaio F.
350

Matteo Gigante defeated Federico Gaio 6-3 7-5 in the Todi CH round of 32 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Federico Gaio came in defending last year's final.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Gigante M.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Gaio F.

Gaio F.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Gigante M.

Serve advantage — Gigante M.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Gigante M.Gaio F.
1st serve in·Even
59%
57%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
49%
Service points won·Even
61%
62%
Return points won·Even
40%
37%
Break points saved·Even
59%
59%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.6
4.6
Double faults / match·Even
3.6
3.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (198 vs 127). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Gigante M.Gaio F.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
58
20
Break points saved·Even
78
76
Break points won·Dominant
35
3
Deciding sets·Dominant
89
40
Tiebreaks·Dominant
54
7

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Gigante M.
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Gaio F.
5.2
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.8
Surface form
4.2
Fatigue & Travel
7.2
Minutes 14d
8.7
8.0
Prev. match
Surface transition
3.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Cachin P.[1]
Kicker N.
6-46-4
Semi-finals
Cachin P.[1]
Passaro F.
6-776-26-1
Kicker N.
Masur D.
6-23-66-4
Quarter-finals
Masur D.
Maestrelli F.
6-26-3
Passaro F.
Darderi L.
6-736-36-4
Kicker N.
Cobolli F.[2]
6-36-3
Cachin P.[1]
Rodriguez Taverna S.[5]
6-36-2
R16
Rodriguez Taverna S.[5]
Dutra Da Silva D.
6-24-66-2
Cobolli F.[2]
Sels J.
6-46-4
Kicker N.
Skatov T.
6-46-3
Maestrelli F.
Torres J.
6-757-626-2
Masur D.
Tirante T.[7]
6-46-1
Darderi L.
Fonio G.
6-37-63
Cachin P.[1]
Gigante M.
7-646-0
Passaro F.
Serdarusic N.[4]
6-47-61
R32
Kicker N.
De Jong J.
3-67-51-0
Serdarusic N.[4]
Ajdukovic D.
6-44-63-2
Gigante M.
Gaio F.
6-37-5
Cobolli F.[2]
Collarini A.
6-36-3
Sels J.
Arnaldi M.
6-36-4
Skatov T.
Horansky F.[6]
5-76-36-1
Torres J.
Furness E.
4-66-36-2
Masur D.
Bellucci M.
6-36-756-2
Tirante T.[7]
Chepelev A.
4-66-36-2
Fonio G.
Popko D.[8]
6-43-66-1
Rodriguez Taverna S.[5]
Bertola R.
5-76-36-4
Cachin P.[1]
Klein L.
6-27-64
Dutra Da Silva D.
Harris B.
6-34-66-1
Maestrelli F.
Muller A.[3]
3-67-626-1
Passaro F.
De Loore J.
2-66-46-1
Darderi L.
Moroni G.
6-47-5