Kacper Zuk vs Gastao Elias — Braunschweig CH Round of 32

Braunschweig CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
POL
Kacper Zuk
27 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWLWLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 4 July 2022
clay
Gastao Elias
POR
Gastao Elias
#728ATP
1447ELO
1425Clay ELO
35 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLWL
Zuk K.
7-6 6-3
Elias G.
Zuk K.
7762
Elias G.
6530

Kacper Zuk defeated Gastao Elias 7-6 6-3 in the Braunschweig CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Kacper Zuk closed it out in two sets, 7–6 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Zuk K.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Elias G.

Elias G.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Zuk K.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Zuk K.Elias G.
1st serve in·Slight edge
60%
55%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
49%
Service points won·Even
63%
60%
Return points won·Even
36%
40%
Break points saved·Even
59%
58%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.2
3.1
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.0
2.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (81 vs 172). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Zuk K.Elias G.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
18
37
Break points saved·Clear edge
76
57
Break points won·Clear edge
9
24
Deciding sets·Dominant
25
86
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
19
7

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Zuk K.
4.5
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Elias G.
4.5
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
1.9
Surface form
2.0
0.0Lost last 6
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
8.5
Minutes 14d
7.5
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
6.0
3.0
Surface transition
3.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Struff J.
Marterer M.
6-26-2
Semi-finals
Struff J.
Laaksonen H.[5]
6-36-3
Marterer M.
Zhang Z.
6-35-77-64
Quarter-finals
Zhang Z.
Cecchinato M.
6-46-726-3
Laaksonen H.[5]
Coria F.[2]
6-46-3
Marterer M.
Zapata Miralles B.[4]
6-36-757-64
Struff J.
Daniel T.
6-26-1
R16
Coria F.[2]
Moraing M.
6-27-5
Struff J.
Agamenone F.
6-36-1
Marterer M.
Janvier M.
6-36-3
Laaksonen H.[5]
Gutierrez O.
6-726-36-4
Zhang Z.
Martinez P.[1]
7-56-3
Zapata Miralles B.[4]
Krutykh O.
6-36-1
Cecchinato M.
Zuk K.
6-14-66-2
Daniel T.
Hanfmann Y.
4-66-36-2
R32
Marterer M.
Andreev A.
6-36-2
Krutykh O.
Nagal S.
7-646-3
Zuk K.
Elias G.
7-656-3
Cecchinato M.
Kovalik J.
7-635-77-5
Martinez P.[1]
Hassan B.
7-664-66-4
Coria F.[2]
Blancaneaux G.
6-26-4
Laaksonen H.[5]
Stricker D.
6-757-646-4
Zhang Z.
Geerts M.
6-796-26-3
Zapata Miralles B.[4]
Kopriva V.
6-16-1
Moraing M.
Travaglia S.
7-666-4
Gutierrez O.
Topo M.
6-26-2
Struff J.
Delbonis F.[3]
6-27-62
Agamenone F.
Molleker R.
6-36-3
Daniel T.
Bonadio R.
6-16-1
Janvier M.
Galan D.[7]
6-33-66-4
Hanfmann Y.
Varillas J.[8]
5-1