Egor Gerasimov vs Evgeny Donskoy — Porto CH Round of 16

Porto CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
BLR6
Egor Gerasimov
33 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 4 July 2022
hard
RUS
Evgeny Donskoy
36 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLLWLWLLL
Gerasimov E.
6-3 6-7 6-2
Donskoy E.
Gerasimov E.
66762
Donskoy E.
37921

Egor Gerasimov defeated Evgeny Donskoy 6-3 6-7 6-2 in the Porto CH round of 16 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Evgeny Donskoy came in leading the head-to-head 3–2. Egor Gerasimov narrowed the head-to-head to 3–3.

Key context

  • Match story: Egor Gerasimov closed it out in three sets, 6–3 6–7 6–2.

Head to head

2–3
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2023-09-20ChengduQ1hardEvgeny Donskoy7-6(3) 4-6 7-6(4)
2021-09-27SofiaQ1hardEgor Gerasimov6-3 7-6(4)
2020-10-12St PetersburgR32hardEvgeny Donskoy6-4 7-6(4)
2019-03-04Indian Wells MastersQ1hardEgor Gerasimov6-3 6-3
2015-01-05ChennaiQ2hardEvgeny Donskoy6-2 1-6 7-5

Serve vs return

This season
Gerasimov E.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Donskoy E.

Donskoy E.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Gerasimov E.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Gerasimov E.Donskoy E.
1st serve in·Slight edge
64%
58%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
52%
Service points won·Even
63%
63%
Return points won·Even
37%
37%
Break points saved·Even
59%
62%
Aces / match·Clear edge
6.3
3.8
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.7
2.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (147 vs 120). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Gerasimov E.Donskoy E.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
44
25
Break points saved·Even
88
89
Break points won·Even
8
5
Deciding sets·Dominant
70
10
Tiebreaks·Dominant
40
65

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Gerasimov E.
4.5
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 42 days (−0.7)
Donskoy E.
5.4
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.4
H2H
4.6
1.6
Surface form
1.7
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
3-set count
7.0
6.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Celikbilek A.
Oconnell C.[3]
7-653-1
Semi-finals
Oconnell C.[3]
Nishioka Y.[2]
6-36-3
Celikbilek A.
Duckworth J.[1]
7-656-4
Quarter-finals
Oconnell C.[3]
Uchida K.
6-46-2
Celikbilek A.
Gerasimov E.[6]
7-56-4
Duckworth J.[1]
Mchugh A.
7-636-0
Nishioka Y.[2]
Grenier H.[5]
2-66-24-0
R16
Nishioka Y.[2]
Nava E.
7-626-3
Grenier H.[5]
Rodrigues D.
6-46-2
Uchida K.
De Schepper K.
7-56-3
Gerasimov E.[6]
Donskoy E.
6-36-776-2
Celikbilek A.
Escoffier A.
6-26-3
Mchugh A.
Ferreira Silva F.
7-656-1
Duckworth J.[1]
Bellier A.
6-26-1
Oconnell C.[3]
Barrere G.
6-36-1
R32
Ferreira Silva F.
Lestienne C.[7]
7-52-1
Nishioka Y.[2]
Kuznetsov A.
7-657-5
Nava E.
Bellucci T.
6-46-3
Gerasimov E.[6]
Decamps G.
6-736-46-1
Donskoy E.
Uchiyama Y.
7-56-4
Celikbilek A.
Olivo R.
6-36-3
Escoffier A.
Borges N.[4]
7-656-4
Mchugh A.
Basic M.
3-66-46-3
Duckworth J.[1]
Araujo P.
6-36-4
Grenier H.[5]
Sousa P.
6-37-5
De Schepper K.
Blanch U.
6-46-4
Bellier A.
Jung J.
6-32-66-4
Oconnell C.[3]
Jasika O.
6-26-4
Barrere G.
Domingues J.
5-77-626-1
Rodrigues D.
Moriya H.
6-46-2
Uchida K.
Marchenko I.
7-637-63