Jan Lennard Struff vs Taro Daniel — Braunschweig CH Quarter-final

Braunschweig CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Jan Lennard Struff
GER
Jan Lennard Struff
#41ATP
1694ELO
1659Clay ELO
$492kYTD
$13MCAREER
36 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLWLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 4 July 2022
clay
Taro Daniel
JPN
Taro Daniel
#194ATP
1567ELO
1542Clay ELO
33 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWWWWWW
Struff J.
6-2 6-1
Daniel T.
Struff J.
662
Daniel T.
210

Jan Lennard Struff defeated Taro Daniel 6-2 6-1 in the Braunschweig CH quarter-final on clay. The result followed the form book — Jan Lennard Struff came in ranked #41, leading the head-to-head 2–1. Jan Lennard Struff extended the head-to-head to 3–1.

Key context

Head to head

2–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2018-07-30KitzbuhelR32clayTaro Daniel7-6(3) 6-1
2017-05-15Rome MastersQ1clayJan Lennard Struff6-1 6-2
2017-04-10MarrakechR32clayJan Lennard Struff4-6 6-3 6-1

Serve vs return

This season
Struff J.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Daniel T.

Daniel T.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Struff J.

Serve advantage — Struff J.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Struff J.Daniel T.
1st serve in·Even
59%
60%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
76%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
52%
Service points won·Even
65%
62%
Return points won·Even
37%
37%
Break points saved·Even
64%
62%
Aces / match·Dominant
8.8
4.0
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.4
2.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Struff J.Daniel T.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
61
42
Break points saved·Slight edge
99
93
Break points won·Clear edge
21
37
Deciding sets·Dominant
68
18
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
94
81

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Struff J.
5.0
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Daniel T.
4.3
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Form & Matchup
7.6+117 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.4Clay Elo 1542
7.5Overall Elo 1694
ELO gap
2.5Overall Elo 1567
5.0
H2H
5.0
4.7
Surface form
4.6
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
6.8
Minutes 14d
5.0
7.0
3-set count
4.0
0.0
Prev. match
7.0
3.0
Surface transition
3.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Struff J.Daniel T.
Freshness·Clear edge
71
59

Struff J.: 7 days rest · 1 match, 34 games (7d) · Daniel T.: 1 day rest · 4 matches, 83 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Struff J.
Marterer M.
6-26-2
Semi-finals
Struff J.
Laaksonen H.[5]
6-36-3
Marterer M.
Zhang Z.
6-35-77-64
Quarter-finals
Zhang Z.
Cecchinato M.
6-46-726-3
Laaksonen H.[5]
Coria F.[2]
6-46-3
Marterer M.
Zapata Miralles B.[4]
6-36-757-64
Struff J.
Daniel T.
6-26-1
R16
Coria F.[2]
Moraing M.
6-27-5
Struff J.
Agamenone F.
6-36-1
Marterer M.
Janvier M.
6-36-3
Laaksonen H.[5]
Gutierrez O.
6-726-36-4
Zhang Z.
Martinez P.[1]
7-56-3
Zapata Miralles B.[4]
Krutykh O.
6-36-1
Cecchinato M.
Zuk K.
6-14-66-2
Daniel T.
Hanfmann Y.
4-66-36-2
R32
Marterer M.
Andreev A.
6-36-2
Krutykh O.
Nagal S.
7-646-3
Zuk K.
Elias G.
7-656-3
Cecchinato M.
Kovalik J.
7-635-77-5
Martinez P.[1]
Hassan B.
7-664-66-4
Coria F.[2]
Blancaneaux G.
6-26-4
Laaksonen H.[5]
Stricker D.
6-757-646-4
Zhang Z.
Geerts M.
6-796-26-3
Zapata Miralles B.[4]
Kopriva V.
6-16-1
Moraing M.
Travaglia S.
7-666-4
Gutierrez O.
Topo M.
6-26-2
Struff J.
Delbonis F.[3]
6-27-62
Agamenone F.
Molleker R.
6-36-3
Daniel T.
Bonadio R.
6-16-1
Janvier M.
Galan D.[7]
6-33-66-4
Hanfmann Y.
Varillas J.[8]
5-1