Altug Celikbilek vs Antoine Escoffier — Porto CH Round of 16

Porto CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
TUR
Altug Celikbilek
29 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLWWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 4 July 2022
hard
FRA
Antoine Escoffier
#753ATP
1436ELO
1413Hard ELO
34 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWLWLL
Celikbilek A.
6-2 6-3
Escoffier A.
Celikbilek A.
662
Escoffier A.
230

Altug Celikbilek defeated Antoine Escoffier 6-2 6-3 in the Porto CH round of 16 on hard. The result followed the form book — Altug Celikbilek came in defending the title.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Celikbilek A.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Escoffier A.

Escoffier A.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Celikbilek A.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Celikbilek A.Escoffier A.
1st serve in·Even
59%
57%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
48%
Service points won·Even
61%
62%
Return points won·Even
38%
39%
Break points saved·Even
60%
60%
Aces / match·Slight edge
6.1
5.2
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.4
3.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (124 vs 198). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Celikbilek A.Escoffier A.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
40
10
Break points saved·Slight edge
73
68
Break points won·Clear edge
38
18
Deciding sets·Dominant
57
11
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
26
3

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Celikbilek A.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Escoffier A.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.7
Surface form
5.7
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
7.6
Minutes 14d
9.2
0.0
3-set count
7.0
6.0
Prev. match
9.0
7.0
Surface transition
7.0
Context
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Celikbilek A.
Oconnell C.[3]
7-653-1
Semi-finals
Oconnell C.[3]
Nishioka Y.[2]
6-36-3
Celikbilek A.
Duckworth J.[1]
7-656-4
Quarter-finals
Oconnell C.[3]
Uchida K.
6-46-2
Celikbilek A.
Gerasimov E.[6]
7-56-4
Duckworth J.[1]
Mchugh A.
7-636-0
Nishioka Y.[2]
Grenier H.[5]
2-66-24-0
R16
Nishioka Y.[2]
Nava E.
7-626-3
Grenier H.[5]
Rodrigues D.
6-46-2
Uchida K.
De Schepper K.
7-56-3
Gerasimov E.[6]
Donskoy E.
6-36-776-2
Celikbilek A.
Escoffier A.
6-26-3
Mchugh A.
Ferreira Silva F.
7-656-1
Duckworth J.[1]
Bellier A.
6-26-1
Oconnell C.[3]
Barrere G.
6-36-1
R32
Ferreira Silva F.
Lestienne C.[7]
7-52-1
Nishioka Y.[2]
Kuznetsov A.
7-657-5
Nava E.
Bellucci T.
6-46-3
Gerasimov E.[6]
Decamps G.
6-736-46-1
Donskoy E.
Uchiyama Y.
7-56-4
Celikbilek A.
Olivo R.
6-36-3
Escoffier A.
Borges N.[4]
7-656-4
Mchugh A.
Basic M.
3-66-46-3
Duckworth J.[1]
Araujo P.
6-36-4
Grenier H.[5]
Sousa P.
6-37-5
De Schepper K.
Blanch U.
6-46-4
Bellier A.
Jung J.
6-32-66-4
Oconnell C.[3]
Jasika O.
6-26-4
Barrere G.
Domingues J.
5-77-626-1
Rodrigues D.
Moriya H.
6-46-2
Uchida K.
Marchenko I.
7-637-63