Christopher Oconnell vs Gregoire Barrere — Porto CH Round of 16

Porto CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
AUS3
Christopher Oconnell
1673ELO
1657Hard ELO
32 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 4 July 2022
hard
FRA
Gregoire Barrere
#1288ATP
32 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWLLLLW
Oconnell C.
6-3 6-1
Barrere G.
Oconnell C.
662
Barrere G.
310

Christopher Oconnell defeated Gregoire Barrere 6-3 6-1 in the Porto CH round of 16 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Oconnell C.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Barrere G.

Barrere G.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Oconnell C.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Oconnell C.Barrere G.
20
Serve
—
32
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Oconnell C.Barrere G.
1st serve in·Even
61%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
52%
Service points won·Even
64%
63%
Return points won·Even
35%
37%
Break points saved·Even
63%
61%
Aces / match·Dominant
7.1
4.1
Double faults / match·Slight edge
1.7
2.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Oconnell C.Barrere G.
Clutch Rating·Even
49
50
Break points saved·Slight edge
98
92
Break points won·Even
22
18
Deciding sets·Dominant
38
84
Tiebreaks·Dominant
93
20

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Oconnell C.
4.7
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Barrere G.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.1
Surface form
4.6
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
7.0
3-set count
Surface transition
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Celikbilek A.
Oconnell C.[3]
7-653-1
Semi-finals
Oconnell C.[3]
Nishioka Y.[2]
6-36-3
Celikbilek A.
Duckworth J.[1]
7-656-4
Quarter-finals
Oconnell C.[3]
Uchida K.
6-46-2
Celikbilek A.
Gerasimov E.[6]
7-56-4
Duckworth J.[1]
Mchugh A.
7-636-0
Nishioka Y.[2]
Grenier H.[5]
2-66-24-0
R16
Nishioka Y.[2]
Nava E.
7-626-3
Grenier H.[5]
Rodrigues D.
6-46-2
Uchida K.
De Schepper K.
7-56-3
Gerasimov E.[6]
Donskoy E.
6-36-776-2
Celikbilek A.
Escoffier A.
6-26-3
Mchugh A.
Ferreira Silva F.
7-656-1
Duckworth J.[1]
Bellier A.
6-26-1
Oconnell C.[3]
Barrere G.
6-36-1
R32
Ferreira Silva F.
Lestienne C.[7]
7-52-1
Nishioka Y.[2]
Kuznetsov A.
7-657-5
Nava E.
Bellucci T.
6-46-3
Gerasimov E.[6]
Decamps G.
6-736-46-1
Donskoy E.
Uchiyama Y.
7-56-4
Celikbilek A.
Olivo R.
6-36-3
Escoffier A.
Borges N.[4]
7-656-4
Mchugh A.
Basic M.
3-66-46-3
Duckworth J.[1]
Araujo P.
6-36-4
Grenier H.[5]
Sousa P.
6-37-5
De Schepper K.
Blanch U.
6-46-4
Bellier A.
Jung J.
6-32-66-4
Oconnell C.[3]
Jasika O.
6-26-4
Barrere G.
Domingues J.
5-77-626-1
Rodrigues D.
Moriya H.
6-46-2
Uchida K.
Marchenko I.
7-637-63