Facundo Bagnis vs Dominic Thiem — Salzburg CH Round of 16

Salzburg CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
ARG7
Facundo Bagnis
#431ATP
1591ELO
1584Clay ELO
36 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 4 July 2022
clay
AUT
Dominic Thiem
32 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWWL
Bagnis F.
6-3 2-6 6-4
Thiem D.
Bagnis F.
6262
Thiem D.
3641

Facundo Bagnis defeated Dominic Thiem 6-3 2-6 6-4 in the Salzburg CH round of 16 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Dominic Thiem came in leading the head-to-head 2–0, but Facundo Bagnis had been the form player, winning 4 of their last 7 on clay. Facundo Bagnis claimed a first win over Dominic Thiem in three meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 2–1.

Key context

  • Match story: Facundo Bagnis closed it out in three sets, 6–3 2–6 6–4.

Head to head

0–2
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2023-07-31KitzbuhelR32clayDominic Thiem7-6(3) 7-6(6)
2023-07-24UmagR32clayDominic Thiem6-4 7-5

Serve vs return

This season
Bagnis F.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Thiem D.

Thiem D.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Bagnis F.

Serve advantage — Bagnis F.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Bagnis F.Thiem D.
1st serve in·Even
63%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
52%
Service points won·Even
62%
63%
Return points won·Even
40%
36%
Break points saved·Even
62%
59%
Aces / match·Even
4.6
4.7
Double faults / match·Even
2.7
2.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (198 vs 117). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Bagnis F.Thiem D.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
54
85
Break points saved·Slight edge
92
98
Break points won·Clear edge
35
58
Deciding sets·Slight edge
89
99
Tiebreaks·Dominant
3
97

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Bagnis F.
5.4
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Thiem D.
3.9
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 42 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
5.0
H2H
5.0
6.0
Surface form
0.6
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 9
Fatigue & Travel
3.3
Minutes 14d
0.0
3-set count
6.0
Prev. match
3.0
Surface transition
Context
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Monteiro T.[6]
Gombos N.
6-37-62
Semi-finals
Monteiro T.[6]
Bagnis F.[7]
3-67-56-3
Gombos N.
Moutet C.
3-67-56-3
Quarter-finals
Monteiro T.[6]
Lajovic D.[2]
6-46-726-4
Bagnis F.[7]
Neuchrist M.
6-26-746-2
Moutet C.
Neumayer L.
6-26-2
Gombos N.
Martin Tiffon P.
6-36-1
R16
Bagnis F.[7]
Thiem D.
6-32-66-4
Lajovic D.[2]
Novak D.
6-46-4
Monteiro T.[6]
Shevchenko A.
6-47-64
Neuchrist M.
Carballes Baena R.[4]
6-756-37-612
Gombos N.
Zeppieri G.
7-57-60
Martin Tiffon P.
Lehecka J.[3]
6-46-4
Moutet C.
Ymer M.[5]
7-626-3
Neumayer L.
Rinderknech A.[1]
7-56-3
R32
Novak D.
Gakhov I.
6-27-5
Shevchenko A.
Guinard M.
6-26-3
Monteiro T.[6]
Rodionov J.
3-66-36-2
Carballes Baena R.[4]
Medjedovic H.
6-46-1
Neuchrist M.
Kolar Z.
7-656-3
Thiem D.
Misolic F.
6-47-5
Gombos N.
Nardi L.
5-77-56-2
Martin Tiffon P.
Miedler L.
6-43-66-0
Ymer M.[5]
Arnaboldi A.
6-46-1
Moutet C.
Ymer E.
6-46-3
Neumayer L.
Simon G.
6-26-4
Rinderknech A.[1]
Sachko V.
6-16-3
Lehecka J.[3]
Ofner S.
6-34-66-4
Lajovic D.[2]
Svrcina D.
7-56-1
Zeppieri G.
Verdasco F.[8]
6-11-67-65
Bagnis F.[7]
Diaz Acosta F.
6-20-0