Christopher Oconnell vs Emilio Nava — Malaga CH Round of 32

Malaga CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
AUS1
Christopher Oconnell
1673ELO
1657Hard ELO
32 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 27 June 2022
hard
Emilio Nava
USA
Emilio Nava
#91ATP
1704ELO
1621Hard ELO
$533kYTD
$2.1MCAREER
24 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWWWWW
Oconnell C.
4-6 6-1 6-2
Nava E.
Oconnell C.
4662
Nava E.
6121

Christopher Oconnell defeated Emilio Nava 4-6 6-1 6-2 in the Malaga CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Oconnell C.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Nava E.

Nava E.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Oconnell C.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Oconnell C.Nava E.
20
Serve
39
32
Return
21

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Oconnell C.Nava E.
1st serve in·Even
61%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
50%
Service points won·Even
64%
64%
Return points won·Even
35%
37%
Break points saved·Even
63%
64%
Aces / match·Slight edge
7.1
7.7
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.7
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Oconnell C.Nava E.
Clutch Rating·Even
49
52
Break points saved·Even
98
94
Break points won·Slight edge
22
17
Deciding sets·Dominant
38
89
Tiebreaks·Dominant
93
23

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Oconnell C.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Nava E.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.4+36 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.6Hard Elo 1621
4.5Overall Elo 1673
ELO gap
5.5Overall Elo 1704
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.2
Surface form
5.6
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
8.7
Minutes 14d
8.2
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
8.0
7.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Oconnell C.Nava E.
Freshness·
—
96

Nava E.: 14 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Lestienne C.[4]
Gomez E.[5]
6-35-76-2
Semi-finals
Lestienne C.[4]
Mmoh M.[7]
4-66-46-4
Gomez E.[5]
Celikbilek A.[6]
5-77-607-66
Quarter-finals
Mmoh M.[7]
Masur D.
4-66-36-4
Celikbilek A.[6]
Barroso Campos A.
7-52-66-3
Gomez E.[5]
Mccabe J.
6-24-66-1
Lestienne C.[4]
Diez S.
6-13-67-66
R16
Barroso Campos A.
Kachmazov A.
6-736-16-2
Mccabe J.
Alvarez Varona N.
6-46-1
Diez S.
Marcora R.
6-36-4
Celikbilek A.[6]
Gengel M.
6-16-1
Gomez E.[5]
Uchida K.
6-16-4
Lestienne C.[4]
Jung J.
6-16-3
Mmoh M.[7]
Bhambri Y.
W/O
Masur D.
Oconnell C.[1]
W/O
R32
Mccabe J.
Escoffier A.
2-66-36-0
Masur D.
Tomic B.
7-656-0
Barroso Campos A.
Pospisil V.[2]
6-36-4
Gengel M.
Ferreira Silva F.
5-76-26-3
Celikbilek A.[6]
Moriya H.
6-36-757-5
Alvarez Varona N.
Escobedo E.[3]
7-646-3
Gomez E.[5]
Uchiyama Y.
7-665-76-4
Marcora R.
Lacko L.
4-66-46-4
Jung J.
Cukierman D.
6-27-5
Bhambri Y.
Kuznetsov A.
4-66-46-1
Diez S.
Wu T.[8]
6-36-4
Uchida K.
Popko D.
6-46-1
Kachmazov A.
Merida Aguilar D.
6-33-66-4
Lestienne C.[4]
Donskoy E.
2-66-37-64
Oconnell C.[1]
Nava E.
4-66-16-2
Mmoh M.[7]
Decamps G.
7-56-1