Daniel Masur vs Bernard Tomic — Malaga CH Round of 32

Malaga CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Daniel Masur
GER
Daniel Masur
#386ATP
1413ELO
1383Hard ELO
31 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLLLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 27 June 2022
hard
Bernard Tomic
AUS
Bernard Tomic
#206ATP
1475ELO
1441Hard ELO
$117kYTD
$6.8MCAREER
33 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLWLLL
Masur D.
7-6 6-0
Tomic B.
Masur D.
7762
Tomic B.
6500

Daniel Masur defeated Bernard Tomic 7-6 6-0 in the Malaga CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Masur D.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Tomic B.

Tomic B.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Masur D.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Masur D.Tomic B.
1st serve in·Even
63%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
50%
Service points won·Even
63%
63%
Return points won·Even
37%
36%
Break points saved·Even
59%
62%
Aces / match·Even
5.4
5.8
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.4
2.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (179 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Masur D.Tomic B.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
10
53
Break points saved·Clear edge
73
92
Break points won·Even
5
4
Deciding sets·Dominant
15
74
Tiebreaks·Dominant
13
79

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Masur D.
5.3
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Tomic B.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
3.9Hard Elo 1383
Surface ELO
6.1+59 Hard Elo edge
3.8Overall Elo 1413
ELO gap
6.2Overall Elo 1475
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
1.9
Surface form
1.8
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
5.7
Minutes 14d
4.0
3-set count
6.0
Prev. match
9.0
7.0
Surface transition
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Masur D.Tomic B.
Freshness·Clear edge
100
84

Masur D.: 15 days rest · Tomic B.: 5 days rest · 2 matches, 45 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Lestienne C.[4]
Gomez E.[5]
6-35-76-2
Semi-finals
Lestienne C.[4]
Mmoh M.[7]
4-66-46-4
Gomez E.[5]
Celikbilek A.[6]
5-77-607-66
Quarter-finals
Mmoh M.[7]
Masur D.
4-66-36-4
Celikbilek A.[6]
Barroso Campos A.
7-52-66-3
Gomez E.[5]
Mccabe J.
6-24-66-1
Lestienne C.[4]
Diez S.
6-13-67-66
R16
Barroso Campos A.
Kachmazov A.
6-736-16-2
Mccabe J.
Alvarez Varona N.
6-46-1
Diez S.
Marcora R.
6-36-4
Celikbilek A.[6]
Gengel M.
6-16-1
Gomez E.[5]
Uchida K.
6-16-4
Lestienne C.[4]
Jung J.
6-16-3
Mmoh M.[7]
Bhambri Y.
W/O
Masur D.
Oconnell C.[1]
W/O
R32
Mccabe J.
Escoffier A.
2-66-36-0
Masur D.
Tomic B.
7-656-0
Barroso Campos A.
Pospisil V.[2]
6-36-4
Gengel M.
Ferreira Silva F.
5-76-26-3
Celikbilek A.[6]
Moriya H.
6-36-757-5
Alvarez Varona N.
Escobedo E.[3]
7-646-3
Gomez E.[5]
Uchiyama Y.
7-665-76-4
Marcora R.
Lacko L.
4-66-46-4
Jung J.
Cukierman D.
6-27-5
Bhambri Y.
Kuznetsov A.
4-66-46-1
Diez S.
Wu T.[8]
6-36-4
Uchida K.
Popko D.
6-46-1
Kachmazov A.
Merida Aguilar D.
6-33-66-4
Lestienne C.[4]
Donskoy E.
2-66-37-64
Oconnell C.[1]
Nava E.
4-66-16-2
Mmoh M.[7]
Decamps G.
7-56-1