Roberto Marcora vs Lukas Lacko — Malaga CH Round of 32

Malaga CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
ITA
Roberto Marcora
36 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWWLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 27 June 2022
hard
SVK
Lukas Lacko
38 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLWLL
Marcora R.
4-6 6-4 6-4
Lacko L.
Marcora R.
4662
Lacko L.
6441

Roberto Marcora defeated Lukas Lacko 4-6 6-4 6-4 in the Malaga CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Roberto Marcora came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Roberto Marcora extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2020-01-20Australian OpenQ1hardRoberto Marcora6-3 6-2

Serve vs return

This season
Marcora R.serving84% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Lacko L.

Lacko L.serving77% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Marcora R.

Serve advantage — Marcora R.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Marcora R.Lacko L.
1st serve in·Even
62%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
67%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
46%
43%
Service points won·Even
59%
58%
Return points won·Even
36%
32%
Break points saved·Slight edge
62%
51%
Aces / match·Clear edge
2.9
5.2
Double faults / match·Even
2.5
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (17 vs 20). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Marcora R.Lacko L.
Clutch Rating·Even
30
26
Break points saved·Slight edge
78
86
Break points won·Slight edge
3
8
Deciding sets·Dominant
58
33
Tiebreaks·Even
25
27

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Marcora R.
3.7
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 217 days (−1.5)
Lacko L.
5.0
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
10.0
H2H
0.0
1.6
Surface form
2.4
0.0Lost last 6
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
8.2
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
8.0
Surface transition
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Lestienne C.[4]
Gomez E.[5]
6-35-76-2
Semi-finals
Lestienne C.[4]
Mmoh M.[7]
4-66-46-4
Gomez E.[5]
Celikbilek A.[6]
5-77-607-66
Quarter-finals
Mmoh M.[7]
Masur D.
4-66-36-4
Celikbilek A.[6]
Barroso Campos A.
7-52-66-3
Gomez E.[5]
Mccabe J.
6-24-66-1
Lestienne C.[4]
Diez S.
6-13-67-66
R16
Barroso Campos A.
Kachmazov A.
6-736-16-2
Mccabe J.
Alvarez Varona N.
6-46-1
Diez S.
Marcora R.
6-36-4
Celikbilek A.[6]
Gengel M.
6-16-1
Gomez E.[5]
Uchida K.
6-16-4
Lestienne C.[4]
Jung J.
6-16-3
Mmoh M.[7]
Bhambri Y.
W/O
Masur D.
Oconnell C.[1]
W/O
R32
Mccabe J.
Escoffier A.
2-66-36-0
Masur D.
Tomic B.
7-656-0
Barroso Campos A.
Pospisil V.[2]
6-36-4
Gengel M.
Ferreira Silva F.
5-76-26-3
Celikbilek A.[6]
Moriya H.
6-36-757-5
Alvarez Varona N.
Escobedo E.[3]
7-646-3
Gomez E.[5]
Uchiyama Y.
7-665-76-4
Marcora R.
Lacko L.
4-66-46-4
Jung J.
Cukierman D.
6-27-5
Bhambri Y.
Kuznetsov A.
4-66-46-1
Diez S.
Wu T.[8]
6-36-4
Uchida K.
Popko D.
6-46-1
Kachmazov A.
Merida Aguilar D.
6-33-66-4
Lestienne C.[4]
Donskoy E.
2-66-37-64
Oconnell C.[1]
Nava E.
4-66-16-2
Mmoh M.[7]
Decamps G.
7-56-1