Facundo Mena vs Facundo Juarez — Cali CH Round of 16

Cali CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Facundo Mena
ARG2
Facundo Mena
#331ATP
1427ELO
1406Clay ELO
33 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLWLWLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 27 June 2022
clay
ITA
Facundo Juarez
#809ATP
28 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLWWLWL
Mena F.
6-4 6-0
Juarez F.
Mena F.
662
Juarez F.
400

Facundo Mena defeated Facundo Juarez 6-4 6-0 in the Cali CH round of 16 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Mena F.serving66% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Juarez F.

Juarez F.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Mena F.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Mena F.Juarez F.
1st serve in·Clear edge
55%
74%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
71%
63%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
48%
Service points won·Even
62%
59%
Return points won·Even
39%
42%
Break points saved·Even
60%
57%
Aces / match·Dominant
5.4
0.9
Double faults / match·Even
2.6
2.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 81). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Mena F.
5.0
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 28 days (−0.3)
Juarez F.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.4
Surface form
4.9
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
6.1
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Mena F.Juarez F.
Freshness·
66
—

Mena F.: 3 days rest · 3 matches, 88 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Mena F.[2]
Zekic M.[8]
6-27-63
Semi-finals
Mena F.[2]
Alvarez N.
7-666-4
Zekic M.[8]
Mejia N.
7-56-4
Quarter-finals
Mena F.[2]
Chung Y.
6-35-77-64
Zekic M.[8]
Burruchaga R.
7-56-2
Mejia N.
Zukas M.
6-16-4
Alvarez N.
Meligeni Alves F.[4]
6-746-47-67
R16
Mena F.[2]
Juarez F.
6-46-0
Chung Y.
Melzer G.[6]
6-46-2
Alvarez N.
Quiroz R.
4-66-36-3
Zekic M.[8]
Krstin P.
4-67-687-5
Burruchaga R.
Barrios Vera T.[1]
4-66-26-1
Zukas M.
Menezes J.
2-66-46-2
Mejia N.
Ficovich J.[3]
7-646-4
Meligeni Alves F.[4]
Otegui J.
2-66-47-62
R32
Meligeni Alves F.[4]
Jaziri M.
6-44-0
Mena F.[2]
Oliveira G.
6-46-4
Juarez F.
Hardt N.
4-67-656-3
Chung Y.
Alves M.
6-46-0
Otegui J.
Durasovic V.
6-37-67
Menezes J.
Lama G.[7]
6-46-2
Zukas M.
Smith K.
6-46-2
Burruchaga R.
Villanueva G.
6-16-1
Barrios Vera T.[1]
Pervolarakis M.
6-27-63
Alvarez N.
Menendez Maceiras A.
7-57-63
Ficovich J.[3]
Urrea A.
6-36-1
Krstin P.
Chappell N.
6-26-4
Melzer G.[6]
Gomez M.
6-06-0
Zekic M.[8]
Kovacevic A.
1-66-46-1
Quiroz R.
Comesana F.[5]
7-50-0
Mejia N.
Zhu E.
6-26-2