Michael Geerts vs Jakub Paul — Troyes CH Round of 32

Troyes CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Michael Geerts
BEL7
Michael Geerts
#328ATP
1400ELO
1348Clay ELO
31 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 27 June 2022
clay
SUI
Jakub Paul
#543ATP
1389ELO
1348Clay ELO
27 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWLLWW
Geerts M.
6-4 6-2
Paul J.
Geerts M.
662
Paul J.
420

Michael Geerts defeated Jakub Paul 6-4 6-2 in the Troyes CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Geerts M.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Paul J.

Paul J.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Geerts M.

Serve advantage — Paul J.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Geerts M.Paul J.
1st serve in·Slight edge
58%
64%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
71%
65%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
50%
Service points won·Even
63%
60%
Return points won·Slight edge
36%
41%
Break points saved·Even
62%
60%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.3
1.7
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.5
1.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 137). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Geerts M.Paul J.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
9
21
Break points saved·Clear edge
82
62
Break points won·Clear edge
3
20
Deciding sets·Even
8
5
Tiebreaks·Dominant
2
85

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Geerts M.
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Paul J.
4.4
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 42 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
5.1+0 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.9Clay Elo 1348
5.2Overall Elo 1400
ELO gap
4.8Overall Elo 1389
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.7
Surface form
2.5
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
3.2
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
9.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Torres J.
Hassan B.
7-626-2
Semi-finals
Hassan B.
Brancaccio R.
6-27-67
Torres J.
Tirante T.[2]
6-43-67-5
Quarter-finals
Hassan B.
Fils A.
6-20-67-5
Torres J.
Hemery C.
7-56-2
Tirante T.[2]
Geerts M.[7]
6-36-4
Brancaccio R.
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
6-06-2
R16
Hemery C.
Van Assche L.
6-33-67-62
Fils A.
Maestrelli F.
6-16-2
Hassan B.
Serdarusic N.[1]
7-626-3
Tirante T.[2]
Jianu F.
6-46-756-2
Geerts M.[7]
Tabur C.
6-46-1
Torres J.
Giustino L.
6-46-3
Brancaccio R.
Michalski D.[8]
5-76-46-2
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
Skatov T.[4]
6-06-2
R32
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
Andreev A.
6-40-66-2
Serdarusic N.[1]
De Loore J.
6-36-4
Jianu F.
Fanselow S.
6-26-4
Tabur C.
Chepelev A.
6-36-4
Torres J.
Janvier M.
6-06-1
Van Assche L.
Karlovskiy E.[5]
6-03-66-2
Tirante T.[2]
Zuk K.
7-56-1
Geerts M.[7]
Paul J.
6-46-2
Hassan B.
Martineau M.
6-727-56-1
Hemery C.
Roca Batalla O.
6-36-4
Brancaccio R.
Lamasine T.
4-66-46-3
Giustino L.
Olivieri G.[3]
7-56-776-1
Fils A.
Casanova H.
6-44-66-4
Michalski D.[8]
Boscardin Dias P.
6-23-66-1
Skatov T.[4]
Hernandez Aguila A.
6-46-1
Maestrelli F.
Nikles J.[6]
6-17-5