Filip Cristian Jianu vs Sebastian Fanselow — Troyes CH Round of 32

Troyes CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Filip Cristian Jianu
ROU
Filip Cristian Jianu
#282ATP
1387ELO
1362Clay ELO
24 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 27 June 2022
clay
GER
Sebastian Fanselow
#1187ATP
34 yrs · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLWLW
Jianu F.
6-2 6-4
Fanselow S.
Jianu F.
662
Fanselow S.
240

Filip Cristian Jianu defeated Sebastian Fanselow 6-2 6-4 in the Troyes CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Jianu F.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Fanselow S.

Fanselow S.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Jianu F.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Jianu F.Fanselow S.
1st serve in·Slight edge
65%
56%
1st serve points won·Even
64%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
49%
Service points won·Even
60%
59%
Return points won·Even
39%
38%
Break points saved·Even
59%
57%
Aces / match·Clear edge
2.1
3.7
Double faults / match·Dominant
1.5
3.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (192 vs 126). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Jianu F.Fanselow S.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
16
4
Break points saved·Clear edge
55
31
Break points won·Dominant
52
5
Deciding sets·Slight edge
13
22
Tiebreaks·Dominant
1
51

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Jianu F.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Fanselow S.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
0.0No prior meetings
H2H
10.0
4.0
Surface form
5.1
Win streak
0.0Lost last 5
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
7.7
3-set count
7.0
7.0
Prev. match
7.0
6.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Torres J.
Hassan B.
7-626-2
Semi-finals
Hassan B.
Brancaccio R.
6-27-67
Torres J.
Tirante T.[2]
6-43-67-5
Quarter-finals
Hassan B.
Fils A.
6-20-67-5
Torres J.
Hemery C.
7-56-2
Tirante T.[2]
Geerts M.[7]
6-36-4
Brancaccio R.
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
6-06-2
R16
Hemery C.
Van Assche L.
6-33-67-62
Fils A.
Maestrelli F.
6-16-2
Hassan B.
Serdarusic N.[1]
7-626-3
Tirante T.[2]
Jianu F.
6-46-756-2
Geerts M.[7]
Tabur C.
6-46-1
Torres J.
Giustino L.
6-46-3
Brancaccio R.
Michalski D.[8]
5-76-46-2
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
Skatov T.[4]
6-06-2
R32
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
Andreev A.
6-40-66-2
Serdarusic N.[1]
De Loore J.
6-36-4
Jianu F.
Fanselow S.
6-26-4
Tabur C.
Chepelev A.
6-36-4
Torres J.
Janvier M.
6-06-1
Van Assche L.
Karlovskiy E.[5]
6-03-66-2
Tirante T.[2]
Zuk K.
7-56-1
Geerts M.[7]
Paul J.
6-46-2
Hassan B.
Martineau M.
6-727-56-1
Hemery C.
Roca Batalla O.
6-36-4
Brancaccio R.
Lamasine T.
4-66-46-3
Giustino L.
Olivieri G.[3]
7-56-776-1
Fils A.
Casanova H.
6-44-66-4
Michalski D.[8]
Boscardin Dias P.
6-23-66-1
Skatov T.[4]
Hernandez Aguila A.
6-46-1
Maestrelli F.
Nikles J.[6]
6-17-5