Emilio Gomez vs Altug Celikbilek — Malaga CH Semi-final

Malaga CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
ECU5
Emilio Gomez
34 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLWLLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 27 June 2022
hard
TUR6
Altug Celikbilek
29 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLWWWL
Gomez E.
5-7 7-6 7-6
Celikbilek A.
Gomez E.
577782
Celikbilek A.
760661

Emilio Gomez defeated Altug Celikbilek 5-7 7-6 7-6 in the Malaga CH semi-final on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Gomez E.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Celikbilek A.

Celikbilek A.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Gomez E.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Gomez E.Celikbilek A.
1st serve in·Even
60%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
48%
Service points won·Even
60%
61%
Return points won·Even
39%
38%
Break points saved·Even
60%
60%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.4
6.0
Double faults / match·Even
3.4
3.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (126 vs 124). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Gomez E.Celikbilek A.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
32
40
Break points saved·Even
77
73
Break points won·Clear edge
19
38
Deciding sets·Dominant
23
57
Tiebreaks·Dominant
79
26

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Gomez E.
6.6
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Celikbilek A.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
7.6
Surface form
3.9
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
9.2
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
Surface transition
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Lestienne C.[4]
Gomez E.[5]
6-35-76-2
Semi-finals
Lestienne C.[4]
Mmoh M.[7]
4-66-46-4
Gomez E.[5]
Celikbilek A.[6]
5-77-607-66
Quarter-finals
Mmoh M.[7]
Masur D.
4-66-36-4
Celikbilek A.[6]
Barroso Campos A.
7-52-66-3
Gomez E.[5]
Mccabe J.
6-24-66-1
Lestienne C.[4]
Diez S.
6-13-67-66
R16
Barroso Campos A.
Kachmazov A.
6-736-16-2
Mccabe J.
Alvarez Varona N.
6-46-1
Diez S.
Marcora R.
6-36-4
Celikbilek A.[6]
Gengel M.
6-16-1
Gomez E.[5]
Uchida K.
6-16-4
Lestienne C.[4]
Jung J.
6-16-3
Mmoh M.[7]
Bhambri Y.
W/O
Masur D.
Oconnell C.[1]
W/O
R32
Mccabe J.
Escoffier A.
2-66-36-0
Masur D.
Tomic B.
7-656-0
Barroso Campos A.
Pospisil V.[2]
6-36-4
Gengel M.
Ferreira Silva F.
5-76-26-3
Celikbilek A.[6]
Moriya H.
6-36-757-5
Alvarez Varona N.
Escobedo E.[3]
7-646-3
Gomez E.[5]
Uchiyama Y.
7-665-76-4
Marcora R.
Lacko L.
4-66-46-4
Jung J.
Cukierman D.
6-27-5
Bhambri Y.
Kuznetsov A.
4-66-46-1
Diez S.
Wu T.[8]
6-36-4
Uchida K.
Popko D.
6-46-1
Kachmazov A.
Merida Aguilar D.
6-33-66-4
Lestienne C.[4]
Donskoy E.
2-66-37-64
Oconnell C.[1]
Nava E.
4-66-16-2
Mmoh M.[7]
Decamps G.
7-56-1