Altug Celikbilek vs Marek Gengel — Malaga CH Round of 16

Malaga CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
TUR6
Altug Celikbilek
29 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLWWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 27 June 2022
hard
Marek Gengel
CZE
Marek Gengel
#373ATP
1411ELO
1377Hard ELO
30 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWWLWWW
Celikbilek A.
6-1 6-1
Gengel M.
Celikbilek A.
662
Gengel M.
110

Altug Celikbilek defeated Marek Gengel 6-1 6-1 in the Malaga CH round of 16 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Celikbilek A.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Gengel M.

Gengel M.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Celikbilek A.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Celikbilek A.Gengel M.
1st serve in·Even
59%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
46%
Service points won·Even
61%
60%
Return points won·Even
38%
38%
Break points saved·Even
60%
56%
Aces / match·Slight edge
6.1
4.9
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.5
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (124 vs 130). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Celikbilek A.Gengel M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
40
11
Break points saved·Dominant
73
35
Break points won·Dominant
38
11
Deciding sets·Even
57
53
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
26
4

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Celikbilek A.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Gengel M.
4.7
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 56 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.9
Surface form
5.3
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
9.2
Minutes 14d
9.0
Prev. match
7.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Lestienne C.[4]
Gomez E.[5]
6-35-76-2
Semi-finals
Lestienne C.[4]
Mmoh M.[7]
4-66-46-4
Gomez E.[5]
Celikbilek A.[6]
5-77-607-66
Quarter-finals
Mmoh M.[7]
Masur D.
4-66-36-4
Celikbilek A.[6]
Barroso Campos A.
7-52-66-3
Gomez E.[5]
Mccabe J.
6-24-66-1
Lestienne C.[4]
Diez S.
6-13-67-66
R16
Barroso Campos A.
Kachmazov A.
6-736-16-2
Mccabe J.
Alvarez Varona N.
6-46-1
Diez S.
Marcora R.
6-36-4
Celikbilek A.[6]
Gengel M.
6-16-1
Gomez E.[5]
Uchida K.
6-16-4
Lestienne C.[4]
Jung J.
6-16-3
Mmoh M.[7]
Bhambri Y.
W/O
Masur D.
Oconnell C.[1]
W/O
R32
Mccabe J.
Escoffier A.
2-66-36-0
Masur D.
Tomic B.
7-656-0
Barroso Campos A.
Pospisil V.[2]
6-36-4
Gengel M.
Ferreira Silva F.
5-76-26-3
Celikbilek A.[6]
Moriya H.
6-36-757-5
Alvarez Varona N.
Escobedo E.[3]
7-646-3
Gomez E.[5]
Uchiyama Y.
7-665-76-4
Marcora R.
Lacko L.
4-66-46-4
Jung J.
Cukierman D.
6-27-5
Bhambri Y.
Kuznetsov A.
4-66-46-1
Diez S.
Wu T.[8]
6-36-4
Uchida K.
Popko D.
6-46-1
Kachmazov A.
Merida Aguilar D.
6-33-66-4
Lestienne C.[4]
Donskoy E.
2-66-37-64
Oconnell C.[1]
Nava E.
4-66-16-2
Mmoh M.[7]
Decamps G.
7-56-1