Calvin Hemery vs Luca Van Assche — Troyes CH Round of 16

Troyes CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
FRA
Calvin Hemery
#298ATP
1439ELO
1449Clay ELO
31 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 27 June 2022
clay
Luca Van Assche
FRA
Luca Van Assche
#86ATP
1701ELO
1639Clay ELO
$411kYTD
$2.6MCAREER
22 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWWWWWLWL
Hemery C.
6-3 3-6 7-6
Van Assche L.
Hemery C.
63772
Van Assche L.
36621

Calvin Hemery defeated Luca Van Assche 6-3 3-6 7-6 in the Troyes CH round of 16 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Luca Van Assche came in ranked #86.

Key context

  • Match story: Calvin Hemery closed it out in three sets, 6–3 3–6 7–6.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Hemery C.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Van Assche L.

Van Assche L.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Hemery C.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Hemery C.Van Assche L.
1st serve in·Even
63%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
50%
Service points won·Even
64%
61%
Return points won·Even
37%
40%
Break points saved·Even
62%
60%
Aces / match·Dominant
6.6
3.4
Double faults / match·Even
3.0
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Hemery C.Van Assche L.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
45
68
Break points saved·Slight edge
85
91
Break points won·Dominant
3
61
Deciding sets·Clear edge
64
81
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
71
51

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Hemery C.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Van Assche L.
7.2
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
3.1Clay Elo 1449
Surface ELO
6.9+190 Clay Elo edge
2.1Overall Elo 1439
ELO gap
7.9Overall Elo 1701
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.9
Surface form
6.9
0.0
Win streak
7.04-match win streak
Fatigue & Travel
7.4
Minutes 14d
2.4
7.0
3-set count
4.0
4.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Hemery C.Van Assche L.
Freshness·Slight edge
69
77

Hemery C.: 2 days rest · 2 matches, 49 games (7d) · Van Assche L.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 30 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Torres J.
Hassan B.
7-626-2
Semi-finals
Hassan B.
Brancaccio R.
6-27-67
Torres J.
Tirante T.[2]
6-43-67-5
Quarter-finals
Hassan B.
Fils A.
6-20-67-5
Torres J.
Hemery C.
7-56-2
Tirante T.[2]
Geerts M.[7]
6-36-4
Brancaccio R.
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
6-06-2
R16
Hemery C.
Van Assche L.
6-33-67-62
Fils A.
Maestrelli F.
6-16-2
Hassan B.
Serdarusic N.[1]
7-626-3
Tirante T.[2]
Jianu F.
6-46-756-2
Geerts M.[7]
Tabur C.
6-46-1
Torres J.
Giustino L.
6-46-3
Brancaccio R.
Michalski D.[8]
5-76-46-2
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
Skatov T.[4]
6-06-2
R32
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
Andreev A.
6-40-66-2
Serdarusic N.[1]
De Loore J.
6-36-4
Jianu F.
Fanselow S.
6-26-4
Tabur C.
Chepelev A.
6-36-4
Torres J.
Janvier M.
6-06-1
Van Assche L.
Karlovskiy E.[5]
6-03-66-2
Tirante T.[2]
Zuk K.
7-56-1
Geerts M.[7]
Paul J.
6-46-2
Hassan B.
Martineau M.
6-727-56-1
Hemery C.
Roca Batalla O.
6-36-4
Brancaccio R.
Lamasine T.
4-66-46-3
Giustino L.
Olivieri G.[3]
7-56-776-1
Fils A.
Casanova H.
6-44-66-4
Michalski D.[8]
Boscardin Dias P.
6-23-66-1
Skatov T.[4]
Hernandez Aguila A.
6-46-1
Maestrelli F.
Nikles J.[6]
6-17-5