Francisco Comesana vs Mariano Navone — Buenos Aires CH Final

Buenos Aires CH · CHALLENGER · Final
Francisco Comesana
ARG3
Francisco Comesana
#94ATP
1695ELO
1656Clay ELO
$580kYTD
$2.5MCAREER
25 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLWWLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 20 June 2022
clay
Mariano Navone
ARG
Mariano Navone
#48ATP
1822ELO
1800Clay ELO
$722kYTD
$3.1MCAREER
25 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWWWWL
Comesana F.
6-4 6-0
Navone M.
Comesana F.
662
Navone M.
400

Francisco Comesana defeated Mariano Navone 6-4 6-0 in the Buenos Aires CH final on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Mariano Navone came in ranked #48, leading the head-to-head 1–0, defending last year's round of 16, but Francisco Comesana had arrived on a 7-match winning run. Francisco Comesana claimed a first win over Mariano Navone in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2025-02-10Buenos AiresR32clayMariano Navone6-4 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Comesana F.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Navone M.

Navone M.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Comesana F.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Comesana F.Navone M.
55
Serve
0
17
Return
95

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Comesana F.Navone M.
1st serve in·Even
64%
67%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
71%
64%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
50%
Service points won·Even
63%
59%
Return points won·Even
39%
43%
Break points saved·Even
60%
56%
Aces / match·Dominant
5.8
1.7
Double faults / match·Even
2.5
2.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Comesana F.Navone M.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
56
75
Break points saved·Even
90
86
Break points won·Dominant
36
90
Deciding sets·Even
79
77
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
38
60

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Comesana F.
6.8
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Navone M.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
3.2Clay Elo 1656
Surface ELO
6.8+144 Clay Elo edge
3.4Overall Elo 1695
ELO gap
6.6Overall Elo 1822
10.0
H2H
0.0
8.5
Surface form
5.8
9.07-match win streak
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
5.2
Minutes 14d
4.0
4.0
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Comesana F.Navone M.
Freshness·Slight edge
90
96

Comesana F.: 11 days rest · 3 matches (14d) · Navone M.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Rodriguez Taverna S.[2]
Diaz Acosta F.[7]
6-46-2
Ugo Carabelli C.[3]
Collarini A.
7-56-2
Comesana F.[3]
Navone M.
6-46-0
Cerundolo J.
Ugo Carabelli C.[4]
6-42-67-5
Semi-finals
Rodriguez Taverna S.[2]
Lama G.[4]
6-16-3
Diaz Acosta F.[7]
Dellien Velasco M.
6-36-1
Collarini A.
Olivieri G.
6-46-1
Ugo Carabelli C.[3]
Varillas J.[2]
3-66-16-0
Navone M.
Jaziri M.[7]
7-56-0
Comesana F.[3]
Meligeni Alves F.[2]
6-36-2
Ugo Carabelli C.[4]
Popko D.
6-26-1
Cerundolo J.
Navone M.
6-37-5
Quarter-finals
Rodriguez Taverna S.[2]
Casanova H.[5]
7-56-4
Lama G.[4]
Pereira J.
6-716-16-4
Diaz Acosta F.[7]
Villanueva G.
6-36-2
Dellien Velasco M.
Burruchaga R.
6-36-1
Varillas J.[2]
Comesana F.
6-46-3
Ugo Carabelli C.[3]
Villanueva G.
6-46-2
Olivieri G.
Rodriguez Taverna S.[7]
7-646-3
Collarini A.
Meligeni Alves F.[5]
1-66-26-2
Jaziri M.[7]
Villanueva G.[4]
6-21-66-3
Comesana F.[3]
Huertas Del Pino A.
6-26-1
Meligeni Alves F.[2]
Reis Da Silva J.
6-46-2
Navone M.
Ficovich J.[1]
3-66-06-3
Popko D.
Burruchaga R.
7-50-66-2
Ugo Carabelli C.[4]
Olivo R.
6-34-66-2
Navone M.
Seyboth Wild T.
6-36-1
Cerundolo J.
Bagnis F.[5]
6-46-2
R16
Rodriguez Taverna S.[2]
Paz J.
7-57-65
Casanova H.[5]
Rubin N.
6-32-66-2
Pereira J.
Gomez F.
6-46-3
Diaz Acosta F.[7]
Navone M.
6-36-2
Burruchaga R.
Gimeno Valero C.[6]
6-04-67-64
Dellien Velasco M.
Lipovsek Puches T.
6-16-1
Lama G.[4]
Torres J.
3-66-36-3
Villanueva G.
Olivieri G.[3]
6-46-1
Comesana F.
Darderi L.
7-656-4
Villanueva G.
Burruchaga R.
7-56-1
Meligeni Alves F.[5]
Lingua Lavallen A.
6-16-3
Collarini A.
Olivo R.[4]
4-66-16-3
Rodriguez Taverna S.[7]
Domingues J.
6-46-3
Varillas J.[2]
Martin Tiffon P.
7-56-4
Olivieri G.
Bagnis F.[1]
7-646-3
Ugo Carabelli C.[3]
Diaz Acosta F.
6-36-2
Reis Da Silva J.
Quiroz R.[5]
4-66-16-2
Huertas Del Pino A.
Huertas Del Pino C.
6-41-66-4
Navone M.
Hardt N.[6]
6-14-66-0
Ficovich J.[1]
Juarez F.
6-16-1
Meligeni Alves F.[2]
Franco Descotte M.
6-36-2
Villanueva G.[4]
Andreozzi G.
7-636-2
Comesana F.[3]
Otegui J.
7-56-2
Jaziri M.[7]
Galarza J.
7-687-66
Olivo R.
Hanfmann Y.[8]
W/O
Burruchaga R.
Altmaier D.[2]
7-667-5
Ugo Carabelli C.[4]
Otegui J.
6-20-66-4
Navone M.
Sanchez Jover C.
4-66-36-1
Bagnis F.[5]
Torres J.
6-16-4
Popko D.
Leite W.
6-46-3
Cerundolo J.
Casanova H.
6-26-2
Seyboth Wild T.
Darderi L.
7-56-3
R32
Navone M.
Kestelboim M.
7-55-3
Gomez F.
Vidal Azorin J.
3-67-627-5
Rodriguez Taverna S.[2]
Rosenkranz M.
6-33-66-3
Rubin N.
Dutra Da Silva D.
7-656-2
Casanova H.[5]
Juarez F.
6-46-1
Lama G.[4]
Franco Descotte M.
7-57-64
Torres J.
Kirchheimer S.
6-16-2
Olivieri G.[3]
Moreno De Alboran N.
6-45-76-2
Lipovsek Puches T.
Aboian V.
6-27-63
Dellien Velasco M.
Andreozzi G.[1]
6-36-2
Gimeno Valero C.[6]
Lingua Lavallen A.
6-41-66-3
Paz J.
Aboian L.
6-37-5
Burruchaga R.
La Serna J.
6-17-65
Villanueva G.
Deckers A.
7-626-4
Pereira J.
Darderi L.[8]
6-47-63
Meligeni Alves F.[5]
Torres J.
7-617-5
Varillas J.[2]
Soares Klier Junior G.
6-26-2
Martin Tiffon P.
Casanova H.
6-26-1
Darderi L.
Kicker N.[6]
6-26-4
Ugo Carabelli C.[3]
Juarez F.
6-26-4
Burruchaga R.
Egea F.
6-26-1
Collarini A.
Lama G.
7-56-3
Olivo R.[4]
Janvier M.
7-676-1
Rodriguez Taverna S.[7]
De La Fuente S.
7-606-4
Domingues J.
Galarza J.
6-46-736-2
Olivieri G.
Dellien Velasco M.
6-34-66-1
Bagnis F.[1]
Huertas Del Pino C.
2-66-36-4
Diaz Acosta F.
Cukierman D.
6-33-66-1
Villanueva G.
Menezes J.[8]
3-66-46-3
Comesana F.
Rodriguez C.
7-677-61
Lingua Lavallen A.
Heide G.
7-677-63
Meligeni Alves F.[2]
Lingua Lavallen A.
6-27-66
Franco Descotte M.
Perchicot M.
6-36-1
Quiroz R.[5]
Monzon I.
6-16-4
Comesana F.[3]
Alvarez N.
6-26-746-3
Otegui J.
Nakagawa N.
6-46-2
Huertas Del Pino C.
Gomez Herrera C.
6-13-67-5
Huertas Del Pino A.
Mejia N.
6-06-1
Jaziri M.[7]
Burruchaga R.
6-40-67-5
Andreozzi G.
Zhu E.
6-17-5
Juarez F.
Farjat T.
6-06-4
Ficovich J.[1]
Dellien Velasco M.
6-756-47-62
Reis Da Silva J.
Barrena A.
6-31-66-4
Navone M.
Aboian V.
6-43-66-3
Villanueva G.[4]
Aboian L.
6-41-66-1
Hardt N.[6]
Tenti F.
6-16-1
Galarza J.
Leite W.
7-626-3
Cerundolo J.
Alvarez N.
6-36-3
Casanova H.
Collarini A.
6-45-76-3
Leite W.
Midon L.
4-66-36-1
Popko D.
Rodriguez Taverna S.[7]
7-680-67-5
Olivo R.
Kicker N.
6-35-76-4
Hanfmann Y.[8]
Villanueva G.
6-26-4
Sanchez Jover C.
Diaz Acosta F.
6-46-4
Seyboth Wild T.
Nagal S.
5-77-647-5
Ugo Carabelli C.[4]
Dutra Da Silva D.
6-26-2
Otegui J.
Monzon I.
5-76-47-64
Altmaier D.[2]
Martin Tiffon P.
6-46-3
Burruchaga R.
Juarez F.
6-36-3
Bagnis F.[5]
Tirante T.
6-16-4
Navone M.
Meligeni Alves F.[6]
6-26-4
Torres J.
Olivieri G.
7-613-66-3
Darderi L.
Coria F.[1]
6-27-64