Ernests Gulbis vs Sebastian Fanselow — Parma CH Qualifying Round 1

Parma CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 1
LAT
Ernests Gulbis
37 yrs · 190 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWLWWWLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 13 June 2022
clay
GER7
Sebastian Fanselow
#1187ATP
34 yrs · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLWLW
Gulbis E.
6-2 6-4
Fanselow S.
Gulbis E.
662
Fanselow S.
240

Ernests Gulbis defeated Sebastian Fanselow 6-2 6-4 in the Parma CH qualifying round 1 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Gulbis E.serving68% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Fanselow S.

Fanselow S.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Gulbis E.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Gulbis E.Fanselow S.
1st serve in·Even
55%
56%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
45%
49%
Service points won·Even
59%
59%
Return points won·Even
39%
38%
Break points saved·Even
56%
57%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.6
3.8
Double faults / match·Clear edge
4.8
3.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (52 vs 126). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Gulbis E.Fanselow S.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
48
4
Break points saved·Dominant
91
31
Break points won·Clear edge
17
5
Deciding sets·Dominant
88
22
Tiebreaks·Dominant
6
51

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Gulbis E.
4.5
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Fanselow S.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.5
Surface form
7.5
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
6.5
Minutes 14d
7.5
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
7.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Q2
Kovalik J.[3]
Ejupovic E.
6-13-66-1
Roca Batalla O.[6]
Barrientos N.[12]
3-66-36-1
Geerts M.[5]
Gulbis E.
6-46-2
Moreno De Alboran N.[4]
Boscardin Dias P.[11]
6-26-4
Ionel N.[8]
Pellegrino A.[2]
3-67-646-0
Domingues J.[9]
Martin A.[1]
6-16-1
Tabacco F.
Potenza L.[10]
6-47-5
Napolitano S.[12]
Chepelev A.[5]
6-24-66-3
Forti F.[11]
Ajdukovic D.[4]
7-56-3
Ovcharenko O.[9]
Gerch L.[3]
6-31-67-65
Roca Batalla O.[2]
Cretu C.[7]
7-56-2
Valkusz M.[1]
Weis A.[8]
6-46-2
Q1
Barrientos N.[12]
Piraino G.
6-726-37-65
Roca Batalla O.[6]
Prihodko O.
4-66-46-4
Gulbis E.
Fanselow S.[7]
6-26-4
Geerts M.[5]
Capecchi D.
6-16-2
Boscardin Dias P.[11]
Bocchi L.
6-36-2
Ejupovic E.
Gautier A.[10]
6-47-5
Kovalik J.[3]
Donati M.
6-03-1
Ionel N.[8]
Mridha J.
1-66-36-3
Pellegrino A.[2]
Weis A.
6-46-2
Domingues J.[9]
Lavagno E.
4-66-46-1
Martin A.[1]
Tabacco F.
6-06-4
Gerch L.[3]
Sorrentino L.
6-46-3
Cretu C.[7]
De Bernardis A.
6-06-4
Ajdukovic D.[4]
Perchicot M.
7-636-2
Napolitano S.[12]
Guerrieri A.
6-46-4
Chepelev A.[5]
Taylor J.
6-46-1
Potenza L.[10]
Salomone F.
6-36-1
Tabacco F.
Echargui M.[6]
6-07-64
Forti F.[11]
Walkin B.
4-67-656-4
Ovcharenko O.[9]
Pospisil J.
6-37-5
Roca Batalla O.[2]
Metreveli A.
6-07-5
Weis A.[8]
Bergevi F.
6-47-5
Valkusz M.[1]
Piraino G.
0-66-06-4