Francisco Comesana vs Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva — Corrientes CH Quarter-final

Corrientes CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Francisco Comesana
ARG2
Francisco Comesana
#94ATP
1695ELO
1656Clay ELO
$580kYTD
$2.5MCAREER
25 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLWWLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 13 June 2022
clay
Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva
BRA
Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva
#250ATP
1486ELO
1470Clay ELO
$76kYTD
$371kCAREER
26 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWLWLW
Comesana F.
6-1 6-2
Reis Da Silva J.
Comesana F.
662
Reis Da Silva J.
120

Francisco Comesana defeated Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva 6-1 6-2 in the Corrientes CH quarter-final on clay. The result followed the form book — Francisco Comesana came in ranked #94.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Comesana F.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Reis Da Silva J.

Reis Da Silva J.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Comesana F.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Comesana F.Reis Da Silva J.
40
Serve
—
16
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Comesana F.Reis Da Silva J.
1st serve in·Even
64%
64%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
71%
65%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
50%
Service points won·Even
63%
60%
Return points won·Even
39%
41%
Break points saved·Even
59%
58%
Aces / match·Dominant
5.8
2.2
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.5
2.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Comesana F.Reis Da Silva J.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
56
12
Break points saved·Dominant
90
49
Break points won·Slight edge
36
43
Deciding sets·Dominant
79
9
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
38
17

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Comesana F.
7.0
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Reis Da Silva J.
5.4
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.8+186 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.2Clay Elo 1470
7.1Overall Elo 1695
ELO gap
2.9Overall Elo 1486
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.6
Surface form
4.6
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
6.4
Minutes 14d
8.8
4.0
3-set count
7.0
7.0
Prev. match
7.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Comesana F.Reis Da Silva J.
Freshness·
90
—

Comesana F.: 11 days rest · 3 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Comesana F.[2]
Navone M.
6-06-3
Semi-finals
Comesana F.[2]
Burruchaga R.
4-66-26-3
Navone M.
Ficovich J.[1]
6-23-66-4
Quarter-finals
Comesana F.[2]
Reis Da Silva J.
6-16-2
Burruchaga R.
Lingua Lavallen A.
6-36-4
Ficovich J.[1]
Hardt N.[5]
7-646-4
Navone M.
Gomez Herrera C.
7-647-61
R16
Hardt N.[5]
Heide G.
6-13-2
Burruchaga R.
Andreozzi G.
4-2
Comesana F.[2]
Franco Descotte M.
5-76-26-4
Lingua Lavallen A.
Juarez F.[7]
6-767-657-5
Gomez Herrera C.
Barrena A.
4-66-46-4
Ficovich J.[1]
Aboian V.
6-46-2
Reis Da Silva J.
Midon L.
3-66-17-5
Navone M.
Monzon I.
6-26-4
R32
Franco Descotte M.
Huertas Del Pino C.
6-42-66-4
Midon L.
Jaziri M.[6]
7-626-3
Lingua Lavallen A.
Huertas Del Pino A.
6-16-1
Heide G.
Panta Herreros J.
6-36-4
Navone M.
Villanueva G.[4]
7-56-4
Burruchaga R.
Mejia N.
6-26-1
Andreozzi G.
Aboian L.
1-66-37-62
Ficovich J.[1]
Farjat T.
6-16-4
Reis Da Silva J.
Tacchi L.
6-36-3
Barrena A.
Alvarez N.[8]
6-26-4
Hardt N.[5]
Tenti F.
6-27-5
Comesana F.[2]
Nakagawa N.
6-26-2
Juarez F.[7]
Dellien Velasco M.
6-46-1
Monzon I.
Leite W.
3-67-637-5
Gomez Herrera C.
Martinez M.
6-46-2