Tamara Zidansek vs Harmony Tan — s Hertogenbosch Round of 32

s Hertogenbosch · WTA · Round of 32
Tamara Zidansek
SLO4
Tamara Zidansek
#148WTA
1655ELO
1481Grass ELO
28 yrs · 168 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLLWLLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 6 June 2022
grass
Harmony Tan
FRA
Harmony Tan
#194WTA
1585ELO
1570Grass ELO
28 yrs · 171 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWWWWLW
Zidansek T.
1-6 6-2 6-4
Tan H.
Zidansek T.
1662
Tan H.
6241

Tamara Zidansek defeated Harmony Tan 1-6 6-2 6-4 in the s Hertogenbosch round of 32 on grass. The result followed the form book — Tamara Zidansek came in ranked #148.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Zidansek T.serving75% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Tan H.

Tan H.serving75% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Zidansek T.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Zidansek T.Tan H.
1st serve in·Slight edge
63%
56%
1st serve points won·Even
61%
65%
2nd serve points won·Even
44%
47%
Service points won·Even
55%
57%
Return points won·Even
46%
44%
Break points saved·Even
54%
57%
Aces / match·Slight edge
1.4
2.3
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.7
2.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (196 vs 164). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Zidansek T.Tan H.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
63
39
Break points saved·Dominant
39
71
Break points won·Clear edge
91
74
Deciding sets·Dominant
85
23
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
95
76

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Zidansek T.
3.5
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Tan H.
4.6
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Form & Matchup
4.6Grass Elo 1481
Surface ELO
5.4+90 Grass Elo edge
6.6Overall Elo 1655
ELO gap
3.4Overall Elo 1585
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.8
Surface form
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
3.0
Surface transition
3.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Zidansek T.Tan H.
Freshness·Even
100
100

Zidansek T.: 20 days rest · Tan H.: 18 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Alexandrova E.[1]
Sabalenka A.[1]
7-56-0
Semi-finals
Sabalenka A.[1]
Rogers S.
7-666-0
Alexandrova E.[1]
Kudermetova V.[6]
6-36-1
Quarter-finals
Kudermetova V.[6]
Bencic B.[2]
6-46-2
Sabalenka A.[1]
Van Uytvanck A.
6-33-67-65
Alexandrova E.[1]
Mcnally C.
6-06-1
Rogers S.
Flipkens K.
3-66-16-4
R16
Kudermetova V.[6]
Blinkova A.
5-75-2
Bencic B.[2]
Kalinskaya A.
7-626-4
Mcnally C.
Zidansek T.[4]
6-16-1
Rogers S.
Rybakina E.[3]
6-26-4
Flipkens K.
Li A.
6-16-1
Sabalenka A.[1]
Hartono A.
6-26-3
Van Uytvanck A.
Mertens E.[3]
6-26-3
Alexandrova E.[1]
Kalinina A.
6-46-2
R32
Mertens E.[3]
Hunter S.
6-756-16-2
Alexandrova E.[1]
Yastremska D.
2-67-616-2
Kalinina A.
Gadecki O.
6-34-66-4
Zidansek T.[4]
Tan H.
1-66-26-4
Flipkens K.
Tikhonova A.
6-25-76-3
Kudermetova V.[6]
Jeanjean L.
6-26-3
Mcnally C.
Saville D.
7-636-3
Kalinskaya A.
Lamens S.
7-656-3
Blinkova A.
Minnen G.
2-66-16-4
Li A.
Samsonova L.[5]
6-36-4
Bencic B.[2]
Brengle M.
6-46-3
Sabalenka A.[1]
Baindl K.
6-46-1
Hartono A.
Preston T.
6-43-66-4
Rogers S.
Diatchenko V.
6-26-4
Rybakina E.[3]
Loeb J.
6-47-5
Van Uytvanck A.
Korpatsch T.
6-47-5