Shelby Rogers vs Elena Rybakina — s Hertogenbosch Round of 16

s Hertogenbosch · WTA · Round of 16
USA
Shelby Rogers
33 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 6 June 2022
grass
Elena Rybakina
KAZ3
Elena Rybakina
#2WTA
2122ELO
1884Grass ELO
$4.4MYTD
$29MCAREER
27 yrs · 184 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLWLWLW
Rogers S.
6-2 6-4
Rybakina E.
Rogers S.
662
Rybakina E.
240

Shelby Rogers defeated Elena Rybakina 6-2 6-4 in the s Hertogenbosch round of 16 on grass. The upset overturned the form book — Elena Rybakina came in leading the head-to-head 4–1. Shelby Rogers narrowed the head-to-head to 4–2.

Key context

Head to head

1–4
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2023-07-03WimbledonR128grassElena Rybakina4-6 6-1 6-2
2022-01-03Adelaide 1QFhardElena Rybakina3-6 6-3 6-2
2021-06-28WimbledonR32grassElena Rybakina6-1 6-4
2021-06-14BerlinR32grassElena Rybakina2-6 6-3 6-4
2020-08-31US OpenR64hardShelby Rogers7-5 6-1
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Rogers S.serving84% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Rybakina E.

Rybakina E.serving93% hold

wins 72% of points on serve vs Rogers S.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Rogers S.Rybakina E.
1st serve in·Even
59%
59%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
67%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
49%
Service points won·Even
59%
63%
Return points won·Even
40%
43%
Break points saved·Slight edge
57%
64%
Aces / match·Dominant
3.8
6.9
Double faults / match·Even
2.8
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (82 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Rogers S.Rybakina E.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
42
92
Break points saved·Clear edge
86
98
Break points won·Clear edge
84
96
Deciding sets·Dominant
15
97
Tiebreaks·Dominant
54
93

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Rogers S.
4.6
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Rybakina E.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Form & Matchup
0.0
H2H
10.0
4.4
Surface form
7.1
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
3-set count
4.0
3.0
Surface transition
3.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Rogers S.Rybakina E.
Freshness·
—
93

Rybakina E.: 10 days rest · 3 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Alexandrova E.[1]
Sabalenka A.[1]
7-56-0
Semi-finals
Sabalenka A.[1]
Rogers S.
7-666-0
Alexandrova E.[1]
Kudermetova V.[6]
6-36-1
Quarter-finals
Kudermetova V.[6]
Bencic B.[2]
6-46-2
Sabalenka A.[1]
Van Uytvanck A.
6-33-67-65
Alexandrova E.[1]
Mcnally C.
6-06-1
Rogers S.
Flipkens K.
3-66-16-4
R16
Kudermetova V.[6]
Blinkova A.
5-75-2
Bencic B.[2]
Kalinskaya A.
7-626-4
Mcnally C.
Zidansek T.[4]
6-16-1
Rogers S.
Rybakina E.[3]
6-26-4
Flipkens K.
Li A.
6-16-1
Sabalenka A.[1]
Hartono A.
6-26-3
Van Uytvanck A.
Mertens E.[3]
6-26-3
Alexandrova E.[1]
Kalinina A.
6-46-2
R32
Mertens E.[3]
Hunter S.
6-756-16-2
Alexandrova E.[1]
Yastremska D.
2-67-616-2
Kalinina A.
Gadecki O.
6-34-66-4
Zidansek T.[4]
Tan H.
1-66-26-4
Flipkens K.
Tikhonova A.
6-25-76-3
Kudermetova V.[6]
Jeanjean L.
6-26-3
Mcnally C.
Saville D.
7-636-3
Kalinskaya A.
Lamens S.
7-656-3
Blinkova A.
Minnen G.
2-66-16-4
Li A.
Samsonova L.[5]
6-36-4
Bencic B.[2]
Brengle M.
6-46-3
Sabalenka A.[1]
Baindl K.
6-46-1
Hartono A.
Preston T.
6-43-66-4
Rogers S.
Diatchenko V.
6-26-4
Rybakina E.[3]
Loeb J.
6-47-5
Van Uytvanck A.
Korpatsch T.
6-47-5