Giulio Zeppieri vs Cristian Rodriguez — Perugia CH Round of 16

Perugia CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Giulio Zeppieri
ITA
Giulio Zeppieri
#218ATP
1622ELO
1566Clay ELO
$70kYTD
$1.4MCAREER
24 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 6 June 2022
clay
COL
Cristian Rodriguez
#1705ATP
36 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLLLLLL
Zeppieri G.
6-2 7-5
Rodriguez C.
Zeppieri G.
672
Rodriguez C.
250

Giulio Zeppieri defeated Cristian Rodriguez 6-2 7-5 in the Perugia CH round of 16 on clay. The result followed the form book — Giulio Zeppieri came in ranked #218, defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Zeppieri G.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Rodriguez C.

Rodriguez C.serving73% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Zeppieri G.

Serve advantage — Zeppieri G.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Zeppieri G.Rodriguez C.
1st serve in·Slight edge
62%
56%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
49%
Service points won·Slight edge
65%
60%
Return points won·Even
37%
35%
Break points saved·Clear edge
65%
51%
Aces / match·Clear edge
6.8
4.3
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.4
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 30). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Zeppieri G.Rodriguez C.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
55
4
Break points saved·Dominant
95
37
Break points won·Clear edge
39
22
Deciding sets·Dominant
68
25
Tiebreaks·Dominant
43
3

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Zeppieri G.
5.0
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Rodriguez C.
4.7
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 28 days (−0.3)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.8
Surface form
1.8
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
8.2
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Munar J.[2]
Etcheverry T.[3]
6-34-66-1
Semi-finals
Etcheverry T.[3]
Marterer M.
6-17-64
Munar J.[2]
Darderi L.
7-53-67-65
Quarter-finals
Munar J.[2]
Monteiro T.[5]
6-757-57-61
Darderi L.
Potenza L.
6-06-1
Etcheverry T.[3]
Coric B.
6-46-3
Marterer M.
Zeppieri G.
6-43-66-3
R16
Potenza L.
Carballes Baena R.[4]
6-12-1
Monteiro T.[5]
Caruso S.
4-66-46-3
Etcheverry T.[3]
Cobolli F.
6-26-756-3
Marterer M.
Arnaboldi A.
6-33-66-3
Darderi L.
Nardi L.
6-746-46-2
Coric B.
Giannessi A.
6-27-66
Munar J.[2]
Passaro F.
7-646-4
Zeppieri G.
Rodriguez C.
6-27-5
R32
Giannessi A.
Fatic N.
7-50-0
Zeppieri G.
Galan D.[6]
6-747-56-3
Monteiro T.[5]
Tabacco G.
6-26-1
Darderi L.
Elias G.
6-36-2
Coric B.
Varillas J.[8]
6-36-2
Etcheverry T.[3]
Cecchinato M.
2-67-646-3
Marterer M.
Taberner C.[1]
7-646-3
Carballes Baena R.[4]
Agamenone F.
6-43-66-4
Potenza L.
Ymer E.
6-43-66-4
Rodriguez C.
Gigante M.
6-36-2
Cobolli F.
Skatov T.
7-646-3
Nardi L.
Mager G.[7]
7-656-726-4
Caruso S.
Benchetrit E.
7-636-3
Munar J.[2]
Arnaldi M.
6-27-5
Passaro F.
Oradini G.
6-42-66-4
Arnaboldi A.
Baldi F.
7-53-1