Caty Mcnally vs Tamara Zidansek — s Hertogenbosch Round of 16

s Hertogenbosch · WTA · Round of 16
Caty Mcnally
USA
Caty Mcnally
#57WTA
1817ELO
1707Grass ELO
$711kYTD
$3.7MCAREER
24 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 6 June 2022
grass
Tamara Zidansek
SLO4
Tamara Zidansek
#148WTA
1655ELO
1481Grass ELO
28 yrs · 168 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLLWLLW
Mcnally C.
6-1 6-1
Zidansek T.
Mcnally C.
662
Zidansek T.
110

Caty Mcnally defeated Tamara Zidansek 6-1 6-1 in the s Hertogenbosch round of 16 on grass. The result followed the form book — Caty Mcnally came in ranked #57, leading the head-to-head 1–0. Caty Mcnally extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2021-03-08GuadalajaraR16hardCaty Mcnally6-4 6-7(4) 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Mcnally C.serving75% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Zidansek T.

Zidansek T.serving71% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Mcnally C.

Serve advantage — Mcnally C.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Mcnally C.Zidansek T.
1st serve in·Slight edge
70%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
62%
61%
2nd serve points won·Even
45%
44%
Service points won·Even
57%
55%
Return points won·Even
46%
46%
Break points saved·Even
54%
54%
Aces / match·Even
1.6
1.4
Double faults / match·Even
3.5
3.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (157 vs 196). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Mcnally C.Zidansek T.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
73
63
Break points saved·Dominant
73
39
Break points won·Slight edge
99
91
Deciding sets·Slight edge
74
85
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
78
95

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Mcnally C.
3.6
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 63 days (−1.2)
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Zidansek T.
2.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Form & Matchup
7.6+226 Grass Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.4Grass Elo 1481
6.5Overall Elo 1817
ELO gap
3.5Overall Elo 1655
5.0
H2H
5.0
4.2
Surface form
3.8
0.0Lost last 4
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
3.0
Surface transition
3.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Mcnally C.Zidansek T.
Freshness·Even
96
100

Mcnally C.: 11 days rest · 2 matches (14d) · Zidansek T.: 20 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Alexandrova E.[1]
Sabalenka A.[1]
7-56-0
Semi-finals
Sabalenka A.[1]
Rogers S.
7-666-0
Alexandrova E.[1]
Kudermetova V.[6]
6-36-1
Quarter-finals
Kudermetova V.[6]
Bencic B.[2]
6-46-2
Sabalenka A.[1]
Van Uytvanck A.
6-33-67-65
Alexandrova E.[1]
Mcnally C.
6-06-1
Rogers S.
Flipkens K.
3-66-16-4
R16
Kudermetova V.[6]
Blinkova A.
5-75-2
Bencic B.[2]
Kalinskaya A.
7-626-4
Mcnally C.
Zidansek T.[4]
6-16-1
Rogers S.
Rybakina E.[3]
6-26-4
Flipkens K.
Li A.
6-16-1
Sabalenka A.[1]
Hartono A.
6-26-3
Van Uytvanck A.
Mertens E.[3]
6-26-3
Alexandrova E.[1]
Kalinina A.
6-46-2
R32
Mertens E.[3]
Hunter S.
6-756-16-2
Alexandrova E.[1]
Yastremska D.
2-67-616-2
Kalinina A.
Gadecki O.
6-34-66-4
Zidansek T.[4]
Tan H.
1-66-26-4
Flipkens K.
Tikhonova A.
6-25-76-3
Kudermetova V.[6]
Jeanjean L.
6-26-3
Mcnally C.
Saville D.
7-636-3
Kalinskaya A.
Lamens S.
7-656-3
Blinkova A.
Minnen G.
2-66-16-4
Li A.
Samsonova L.[5]
6-36-4
Bencic B.[2]
Brengle M.
6-46-3
Sabalenka A.[1]
Baindl K.
6-46-1
Hartono A.
Preston T.
6-43-66-4
Rogers S.
Diatchenko V.
6-26-4
Rybakina E.[3]
Loeb J.
6-47-5
Van Uytvanck A.
Korpatsch T.
6-47-5