Jordan Thompson vs Mikhail Kukushkin — Nottingham CH Quarter-final

Nottingham CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Jordan Thompson
AUS3
Jordan Thompson
#309ATP
1772ELO
1709Grass ELO
$153kYTD
$9.6MCAREER
32 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWWLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 6 June 2022
grass
Mikhail Kukushkin
KAZ
Mikhail Kukushkin
#316ATP
1552ELO
1510Grass ELO
38 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWLWL
Thompson J.
6-2 4-6 6-3
Kukushkin M.
Thompson J.
6462
Kukushkin M.
2631

Jordan Thompson defeated Mikhail Kukushkin 6-2 4-6 6-3 in the Nottingham CH quarter-final on grass. Jordan Thompson extended the head-to-head to 2–1.

Key context

  • Match story: Jordan Thompson closed it out in three sets, 6–2 4–6 6–3.

Head to head

1–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2020-08-31US OpenR32hardJordan Thompson7-5 6-4 6-1
2017-03-06Indian Wells MastersR128hardMikhail Kukushkin1-6 6-1 3-0 RET

Serve vs return

This season
Thompson J.serving90% hold

wins 70% of points on serve vs Kukushkin M.

Kukushkin M.serving87% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Thompson J.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Thompson J.Kukushkin M.
1st serve in·Slight edge
60%
66%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
74%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
54%
53%
Service points won·Even
66%
63%
Return points won·Even
37%
38%
Break points saved·Even
63%
61%
Aces / match·Dominant
7.2
2.9
Double faults / match·Even
1.3
1.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 198). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Thompson J.Kukushkin M.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
70
46
Break points saved·Even
97
93
Break points won·Clear edge
24
41
Deciding sets·Dominant
91
41
Tiebreaks·Dominant
95
44

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Thompson J.
7.6
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Kukushkin M.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
7.1+198 Grass Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.9Grass Elo 1510
7.6Overall Elo 1772
ELO gap
2.4Overall Elo 1552
5.0
H2H
5.0
9.1
Surface form
4.2
9.05-match win streak
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
4.4
Minutes 14d
9.0
4.0
3-set count
8.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Evans D.[1]
Thompson J.[3]
6-46-4
Semi-finals
Thompson J.[3]
Popyrin A.[5]
6-46-2
Evans D.[1]
Sock J.[7]
7-56-3
Quarter-finals
Thompson J.[3]
Kukushkin M.
6-24-66-3
Sock J.[7]
Broady L.
7-631-66-4
Evans D.[1]
Huesler M.[8]
6-46-4
Popyrin A.[5]
Peniston R.
6-36-4
R16
Peniston R.
Gojo B.
6-47-64
Popyrin A.[5]
Escoffier A.
6-37-5
Kukushkin M.
Verdasco F.[6]
6-36-726-4
Thompson J.[3]
Clarke J.
6-46-4
Evans D.[1]
Fabbiano T.
7-56-0
Sock J.[7]
Blancaneaux G.
6-04-66-2
Broady L.
Virtanen O.
2-67-56-2
Huesler M.[8]
Cox D.
6-24-66-2
R32
Peniston R.
Vesely J.[2]
6-777-657-66
Popyrin A.[5]
Lacko L.
6-46-2
Gojo B.
Jung J.
6-27-63
Escoffier A.
Pouille L.
5-76-46-4
Clarke J.
Jubb P.
6-36-2
Kukushkin M.
Copil M.
6-46-4
Sock J.[7]
Squire H.
6-27-67
Blancaneaux G.
Ramanathan R.
7-637-5
Virtanen O.
Millman J.[4]
7-656-3
Cox D.
Gaio F.
2-66-46-3
Evans D.[1]
Couacaud E.
7-57-63
Thompson J.[3]
Bellier A.
6-36-4
Fabbiano T.
Ajdukovic D.
4-67-636-4
Broady L.
Lestienne C.
6-44-66-3
Huesler M.[8]
Escobedo E.
6-46-4
Verdasco F.[6]
Gray A.
7-637-66