Sam Querrey vs Robin Haase — s Hertogenbosch Round of 32

s Hertogenbosch · ATP · Round of 32
USA
Sam Querrey
38 yrs · 198 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWWWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 6 June 2022
grass
NED
Robin Haase
39 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWWLLL
Querrey S.
6-3 6-2
Haase R.
Querrey S.
662
Haase R.
320

Sam Querrey defeated Robin Haase 6-3 6-2 in the s Hertogenbosch round of 32 on grass.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Querrey S.serving90% hold

wins 70% of points on serve vs Haase R.

Haase R.serving93% hold

wins 73% of points on serve vs Querrey S.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Querrey S.Haase R.
1st serve in·Even
61%
59%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
77%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
44%
48%
Service points won·Even
64%
62%
Return points won·Slight edge
30%
36%
Break points saved·Even
61%
61%
Aces / match·Dominant
12.3
5.7
Double faults / match·Clear edge
4.3
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (21 vs 68). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Querrey S.Haase R.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
49
33
Break points saved·Slight edge
96
91
Break points won·Slight edge
14
24
Deciding sets·Clear edge
63
41
Tiebreaks·Dominant
55
13

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Querrey S.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Haase R.
5.4
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.4
Surface form
4.9
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
9.2
Minutes 14d
6.8
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
Surface transition
3.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Van Rijthoven T.
Medvedev D.[3]
6-46-1
Semi-finals
Van Rijthoven T.
Auger Aliassime F.[1]
6-31-67-65
Medvedev D.[3]
Mannarino A.
7-57-5
Quarter-finals
Mannarino A.
Nakashima B.
6-756-16-4
Van Rijthoven T.
Gaston H.
7-626-4
Medvedev D.[3]
Ivashka I.
7-686-4
Auger Aliassime F.[1]
Khachanov K.[5]
7-656-4
R16
Nakashima B.
Querrey S.
7-647-66
Ivashka I.
Ruusuvuori E.
6-46-2
Gaston H.
Brooksby J.[8]
3-66-37-5
Auger Aliassime F.[1]
Griekspoor T.[6]
7-627-65
Khachanov K.[5]
Majchrzak K.
5-77-57-65
Van Rijthoven T.
Fritz T.[3]
6-797-56-4
Mannarino A.
De Minaur A.[2]
6-26-3
Medvedev D.[3]
Simon G.
7-56-4
R32
Brooksby J.[8]
De Jong J.
7-636-3
Van Rijthoven T.
Ebden M.
7-647-69
Mannarino A.
Seppi A.
7-647-69
Griekspoor T.[6]
Bedene A.
7-57-5
Querrey S.
Haase R.
6-36-2
Gaston H.
Kwon S.
6-26-1
Nakashima B.
Paul T.[7]
6-747-657-62
Majchrzak K.
Koepfer D.
6-16-4
Ruusuvuori E.
Van De Zandschulp B.[6]
4-66-26-1
Simon G.
Duckworth J.
6-47-69
Khachanov K.[5]
Tabilo A.
6-36-3
Ivashka I.
Mcdonald M.
6-36-786-1