Ryan Peniston vs Borna Gojo — Nottingham CH Round of 16

Nottingham CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Ryan Peniston
GBR
Ryan Peniston
#417ATP
1441ELO
1440Grass ELO
30 yrs · 180 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 6 June 2022
grass
Borna Gojo
CRO
Borna Gojo
#168ATP
1683ELO
1468Grass ELO
$139kYTD
$1.6MCAREER
28 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLLWWW
Peniston R.
6-4 7-6
Gojo B.
Peniston R.
6772
Gojo B.
4640

Ryan Peniston defeated Borna Gojo 6-4 7-6 in the Nottingham CH round of 16 on grass.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Peniston R.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Gojo B.

Gojo B.serving87% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Peniston R.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Peniston R.Gojo B.
1st serve in·Even
60%
64%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
68%
76%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
50%
Service points won·Slight edge
61%
67%
Return points won·Slight edge
41%
36%
Break points saved·Slight edge
57%
67%
Aces / match·Dominant
2.7
10.5
Double faults / match·Even
3.0
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (188 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Peniston R.Gojo B.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
20
53
Break points saved·Dominant
60
95
Break points won·Clear edge
25
10
Deciding sets·Dominant
36
70
Tiebreaks·Dominant
15
73

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Peniston R.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Gojo B.
5.4
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Form & Matchup
4.7Grass Elo 1440
Surface ELO
5.3+28 Grass Elo edge
2.0Overall Elo 1441
ELO gap
8.0Overall Elo 1683
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.2
Surface form
4.9
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
5.8
Minutes 14d
0.0
3-set count
0.0
4.0
Prev. match
Surface transition
3.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Peniston R.Gojo B.
Freshness·
—
100

Gojo B.: 20 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Evans D.[1]
Thompson J.[3]
6-46-4
Semi-finals
Thompson J.[3]
Popyrin A.[5]
6-46-2
Evans D.[1]
Sock J.[7]
7-56-3
Quarter-finals
Thompson J.[3]
Kukushkin M.
6-24-66-3
Sock J.[7]
Broady L.
7-631-66-4
Evans D.[1]
Huesler M.[8]
6-46-4
Popyrin A.[5]
Peniston R.
6-36-4
R16
Peniston R.
Gojo B.
6-47-64
Popyrin A.[5]
Escoffier A.
6-37-5
Kukushkin M.
Verdasco F.[6]
6-36-726-4
Thompson J.[3]
Clarke J.
6-46-4
Evans D.[1]
Fabbiano T.
7-56-0
Sock J.[7]
Blancaneaux G.
6-04-66-2
Broady L.
Virtanen O.
2-67-56-2
Huesler M.[8]
Cox D.
6-24-66-2
R32
Peniston R.
Vesely J.[2]
6-777-657-66
Popyrin A.[5]
Lacko L.
6-46-2
Gojo B.
Jung J.
6-27-63
Escoffier A.
Pouille L.
5-76-46-4
Clarke J.
Jubb P.
6-36-2
Kukushkin M.
Copil M.
6-46-4
Sock J.[7]
Squire H.
6-27-67
Blancaneaux G.
Ramanathan R.
7-637-5
Virtanen O.
Millman J.[4]
7-656-3
Cox D.
Gaio F.
2-66-46-3
Evans D.[1]
Couacaud E.
7-57-63
Thompson J.[3]
Bellier A.
6-36-4
Fabbiano T.
Ajdukovic D.
4-67-636-4
Broady L.
Lestienne C.
6-44-66-3
Huesler M.[8]
Escobedo E.
6-46-4
Verdasco F.[6]
Gray A.
7-637-66