Cristian Rodriguez vs Matteo Gigante — Perugia CH Round of 32

Perugia CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
COL
Cristian Rodriguez
#1705ATP
36 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLLLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 6 June 2022
clay
Matteo Gigante
ITA
Matteo Gigante
#526ATP
1592ELO
1598Clay ELO
24 yrs · 180 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWLLL
Rodriguez C.
6-3 6-2
Gigante M.
Rodriguez C.
662
Gigante M.
320

Cristian Rodriguez defeated Matteo Gigante 6-3 6-2 in the Perugia CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Rodriguez C.serving64% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Gigante M.

Gigante M.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Rodriguez C.

Serve advantage — Gigante M.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Rodriguez C.Gigante M.
1st serve in·Even
56%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
49%
Service points won·Even
60%
61%
Return points won·Slight edge
34%
41%
Break points saved·Slight edge
51%
59%
Aces / match·Even
4.1
3.6
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.0
3.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (30 vs 198). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Rodriguez C.Gigante M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
4
58
Break points saved·Dominant
37
78
Break points won·Clear edge
22
35
Deciding sets·Dominant
25
89
Tiebreaks·Dominant
3
54

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Rodriguez C.
4.7
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 28 days (−0.3)
Gigante M.
6.9
Slight advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
1.8
Surface form
8.0
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak
7.04-match win streak
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
0.0
3-set count
0.0
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Munar J.[2]
Etcheverry T.[3]
6-34-66-1
Semi-finals
Etcheverry T.[3]
Marterer M.
6-17-64
Munar J.[2]
Darderi L.
7-53-67-65
Quarter-finals
Munar J.[2]
Monteiro T.[5]
6-757-57-61
Darderi L.
Potenza L.
6-06-1
Etcheverry T.[3]
Coric B.
6-46-3
Marterer M.
Zeppieri G.
6-43-66-3
R16
Potenza L.
Carballes Baena R.[4]
6-12-1
Monteiro T.[5]
Caruso S.
4-66-46-3
Etcheverry T.[3]
Cobolli F.
6-26-756-3
Marterer M.
Arnaboldi A.
6-33-66-3
Darderi L.
Nardi L.
6-746-46-2
Coric B.
Giannessi A.
6-27-66
Munar J.[2]
Passaro F.
7-646-4
Zeppieri G.
Rodriguez C.
6-27-5
R32
Giannessi A.
Fatic N.
7-50-0
Zeppieri G.
Galan D.[6]
6-747-56-3
Monteiro T.[5]
Tabacco G.
6-26-1
Darderi L.
Elias G.
6-36-2
Coric B.
Varillas J.[8]
6-36-2
Etcheverry T.[3]
Cecchinato M.
2-67-646-3
Marterer M.
Taberner C.[1]
7-646-3
Carballes Baena R.[4]
Agamenone F.
6-43-66-4
Potenza L.
Ymer E.
6-43-66-4
Rodriguez C.
Gigante M.
6-36-2
Cobolli F.
Skatov T.
7-646-3
Nardi L.
Mager G.[7]
7-656-726-4
Caruso S.
Benchetrit E.
7-636-3
Munar J.[2]
Arnaldi M.
6-27-5
Passaro F.
Oradini G.
6-42-66-4
Arnaboldi A.
Baldi F.
7-53-1