Daniel Evans vs Jack Sock — Nottingham CH Semi-final

Nottingham CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
Daniel Evans
GBR1
Daniel Evans
#501ATP
1588ELO
1584Grass ELO
36 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWLLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 6 June 2022
grass
USA7
Jack Sock
33 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWLLL
Evans D.
7-5 6-3
Sock J.
Evans D.
762
Sock J.
530

Daniel Evans defeated Jack Sock 7-5 6-3 in the Nottingham CH semi-final on grass. The upset overturned the form book — Jack Sock came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Daniel Evans claimed a first win over Jack Sock in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

  • Match story: Daniel Evans closed it out in two sets, 7–5 6–3.

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2016-07-18WashingtonR16hardJack Sock6-1 7-5

Serve vs return

This season
Evans D.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Sock J.

Sock J.serving90% hold

wins 70% of points on serve vs Evans D.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Evans D.Sock J.
1st serve in·Even
59%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
52%
Service points won·Even
63%
65%
Return points won·Even
37%
36%
Break points saved·Even
59%
63%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.2
6.0
Double faults / match·Even
3.1
3.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (198 vs 60). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Evans D.Sock J.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
73
67
Break points saved·Even
97
96
Break points won·Dominant
61
28
Deciding sets·Even
82
86
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
66
82

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Evans D.
5.1
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Sock J.
5.2
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Form & Matchup
5.0
H2H
5.0
7.0
Surface form
4.3
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
4.0
3-set count
3.0
Surface transition
3.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Evans D.Sock J.
Freshness·
100
—

Evans D.: 20 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Evans D.[1]
Thompson J.[3]
6-46-4
Semi-finals
Thompson J.[3]
Popyrin A.[5]
6-46-2
Evans D.[1]
Sock J.[7]
7-56-3
Quarter-finals
Thompson J.[3]
Kukushkin M.
6-24-66-3
Sock J.[7]
Broady L.
7-631-66-4
Evans D.[1]
Huesler M.[8]
6-46-4
Popyrin A.[5]
Peniston R.
6-36-4
R16
Peniston R.
Gojo B.
6-47-64
Popyrin A.[5]
Escoffier A.
6-37-5
Kukushkin M.
Verdasco F.[6]
6-36-726-4
Thompson J.[3]
Clarke J.
6-46-4
Evans D.[1]
Fabbiano T.
7-56-0
Sock J.[7]
Blancaneaux G.
6-04-66-2
Broady L.
Virtanen O.
2-67-56-2
Huesler M.[8]
Cox D.
6-24-66-2
R32
Peniston R.
Vesely J.[2]
6-777-657-66
Popyrin A.[5]
Lacko L.
6-46-2
Gojo B.
Jung J.
6-27-63
Escoffier A.
Pouille L.
5-76-46-4
Clarke J.
Jubb P.
6-36-2
Kukushkin M.
Copil M.
6-46-4
Sock J.[7]
Squire H.
6-27-67
Blancaneaux G.
Ramanathan R.
7-637-5
Virtanen O.
Millman J.[4]
7-656-3
Cox D.
Gaio F.
2-66-46-3
Evans D.[1]
Couacaud E.
7-57-63
Thompson J.[3]
Bellier A.
6-36-4
Fabbiano T.
Ajdukovic D.
4-67-636-4
Broady L.
Lestienne C.
6-44-66-3
Huesler M.[8]
Escobedo E.
6-46-4
Verdasco F.[6]
Gray A.
7-637-66