Caroline Garcia vs Lauren Davis — Nottingham Round of 32

Nottingham · WTA · Round of 32
FRA
Caroline Garcia
#772WTA
32 yrs · 177 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLWLWLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 6 June 2022
grass
USA
Lauren Davis
32 yrs · 157 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWLW
Garcia C.
6-3 7-6
Davis L.
Garcia C.
6772
Davis L.
3630

Caroline Garcia defeated Lauren Davis 6-3 7-6 in the Nottingham round of 32 on grass. The result followed the form book — Caroline Garcia came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Caroline Garcia extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2015-10-12Hong KongR32hardCaroline Garcia6-1 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Garcia C.serving87% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Davis L.

Davis L.serving84% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Garcia C.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Garcia C.Davis L.
1st serve in·Even
60%
61%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
71%
62%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
46%
Service points won·Slight edge
62%
55%
Return points won·Slight edge
39%
44%
Break points saved·Slight edge
62%
51%
Aces / match·Dominant
6.8
1.7
Double faults / match·Even
3.1
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (176 vs 137). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Garcia C.Davis L.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
72
51
Break points saved·Dominant
91
26
Break points won·Dominant
50
79
Deciding sets·Slight edge
93
86
Tiebreaks·Even
82
82

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Garcia C.
5.1
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Davis L.
4.7
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 28 days (−0.3)
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Form & Matchup
5.0
H2H
5.0
5.1
Surface form
5.7
Fatigue & Travel
Prev. match
8.0
3.0
Surface transition
3.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
8.5

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Haddad Maia B.[7]
Riske Amritraj A.[6]
6-41-66-3
Semi-finals
Haddad Maia B.[7]
Martincova T.
6-34-1
Riske Amritraj A.[6]
Golubic V.
6-34-66-3
Quarter-finals
Golubic V.
Tomljanovic A.[5]
6-27-66
Martincova T.
Zhang S.[4]
6-36-2
Haddad Maia B.[7]
Sakkari M.[6]
6-44-66-3
Riske Amritraj A.[6]
Dart H.
4-66-26-1
R16
Riske Amritraj A.[6]
Garcia C.
6-47-5
Haddad Maia B.[7]
Miyazaki Y.
6-27-64
Zhang S.[4]
Burrage J.
6-27-64
Sakkari M.[6]
Marino R.
1-66-36-3
Martincova T.
Linette M.[8]
6-27-63
Tomljanovic A.[5]
Boulter K.
6-36-4
Golubic V.
Watson H.
7-56-2
Dart H.
Giorgi C.[3]
5-76-47-63
R32
Martincova T.
Dodin O.
7-617-5
Tomljanovic A.[5]
Wang X.
6-46-4
Watson H.
Volynets K.
6-46-2
Dart H.
Vekic D.
6-46-3
Golubic V.
Raducanu E.
4-3
Zhang S.[4]
Bucsa C.
7-646-3
Haddad Maia B.[7]
Wang Q.
5-76-46-3
Marino R.
Silva E.
6-46-4
Miyazaki Y.
Frech M.
6-41-66-1
Linette M.[8]
Kawa K.
7-646-2
Boulter K.
Maria T.
4-66-16-4
Sakkari M.[6]
Osorio C.
6-26-3
Burrage J.
Zhu L.
7-656-4
Riske Amritraj A.[6]
Snigur D.
7-56-3
Giorgi C.[3]
Kartal S.
6-46-3
Garcia C.
Davis L.
6-37-63