Mikhail Kukushkin vs Marius Copil — Nottingham CH Round of 32

Nottingham CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Mikhail Kukushkin
KAZ
Mikhail Kukushkin
#316ATP
1552ELO
1510Grass ELO
38 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 6 June 2022
grass
ROU
Marius Copil
35 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLW
Kukushkin M.
6-4 6-4
Copil M.
Kukushkin M.
662
Copil M.
440

Mikhail Kukushkin defeated Marius Copil 6-4 6-4 in the Nottingham CH round of 32 on grass. Mikhail Kukushkin extended the head-to-head to 2–1.

Key context

  • Match story: Mikhail Kukushkin edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

1–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2018-03-19Miami MastersR128hardMarius Copil7-6(2) 6-4
2015-01-04BrisbaneR32hardMikhail Kukushkin6-4 4-6 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Kukushkin M.serving90% hold

wins 70% of points on serve vs Copil M.

Copil M.serving90% hold

wins 70% of points on serve vs Kukushkin M.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Kukushkin M.Copil M.
1st serve in·Slight edge
66%
59%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
68%
76%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
52%
Service points won·Even
63%
66%
Return points won·Even
38%
35%
Break points saved·Even
61%
62%
Aces / match·Dominant
2.9
8.4
Double faults / match·Dominant
1.1
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (198 vs 114). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Kukushkin M.Copil M.
Clutch Rating·Even
46
47
Break points saved·Even
93
91
Break points won·Dominant
41
3
Deciding sets·Clear edge
41
63
Tiebreaks·Dominant
44
79

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Kukushkin M.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Copil M.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0
H2H
5.0
4.2
Surface form
5.6
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
9.0
Minutes 14d
8.0
8.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Evans D.[1]
Thompson J.[3]
6-46-4
Semi-finals
Thompson J.[3]
Popyrin A.[5]
6-46-2
Evans D.[1]
Sock J.[7]
7-56-3
Quarter-finals
Thompson J.[3]
Kukushkin M.
6-24-66-3
Sock J.[7]
Broady L.
7-631-66-4
Evans D.[1]
Huesler M.[8]
6-46-4
Popyrin A.[5]
Peniston R.
6-36-4
R16
Peniston R.
Gojo B.
6-47-64
Popyrin A.[5]
Escoffier A.
6-37-5
Kukushkin M.
Verdasco F.[6]
6-36-726-4
Thompson J.[3]
Clarke J.
6-46-4
Evans D.[1]
Fabbiano T.
7-56-0
Sock J.[7]
Blancaneaux G.
6-04-66-2
Broady L.
Virtanen O.
2-67-56-2
Huesler M.[8]
Cox D.
6-24-66-2
R32
Peniston R.
Vesely J.[2]
6-777-657-66
Popyrin A.[5]
Lacko L.
6-46-2
Gojo B.
Jung J.
6-27-63
Escoffier A.
Pouille L.
5-76-46-4
Clarke J.
Jubb P.
6-36-2
Kukushkin M.
Copil M.
6-46-4
Sock J.[7]
Squire H.
6-27-67
Blancaneaux G.
Ramanathan R.
7-637-5
Virtanen O.
Millman J.[4]
7-656-3
Cox D.
Gaio F.
2-66-46-3
Evans D.[1]
Couacaud E.
7-57-63
Thompson J.[3]
Bellier A.
6-36-4
Fabbiano T.
Ajdukovic D.
4-67-636-4
Broady L.
Lestienne C.
6-44-66-3
Huesler M.[8]
Escobedo E.
6-46-4
Verdasco F.[6]
Gray A.
7-637-66