Jordan Thompson vs Jay Clarke — Nottingham CH Round of 16

Nottingham CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Jordan Thompson
AUS3
Jordan Thompson
#309ATP
1772ELO
1709Grass ELO
$153kYTD
$9.6MCAREER
32 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 6 June 2022
grass
GBR
Jay Clarke
#239ATP
1458ELO
1360Grass ELO
27 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWLLLW
Thompson J.
6-4 6-4
Clarke J.
Thompson J.
662
Clarke J.
440

Jordan Thompson defeated Jay Clarke 6-4 6-4 in the Nottingham CH round of 16 on grass.

Key context

  • Match story: Jordan Thompson edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Thompson J.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Clarke J.

Clarke J.serving84% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Thompson J.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Thompson J.Clarke J.
1st serve in·Even
60%
57%
1st serve points won·Even
74%
70%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
54%
49%
Service points won·Slight edge
66%
61%
Return points won·Even
37%
39%
Break points saved·Slight edge
63%
58%
Aces / match·Dominant
7.2
3.9
Double faults / match·Dominant
1.3
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 168). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Thompson J.Clarke J.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
70
8
Break points saved·Dominant
97
63
Break points won·Even
24
21
Deciding sets·Dominant
91
10
Tiebreaks·Dominant
95
4

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Thompson J.
8.2
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Clarke J.
4.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
9.6+349 Grass Elo edge
Surface ELO
0.4Grass Elo 1360
9.3Overall Elo 1772
ELO gap
0.7Overall Elo 1458
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
9.1
Surface form
1.9
9.05-match win streak
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
4.4
Minutes 14d
8.9
4.0
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Evans D.[1]
Thompson J.[3]
6-46-4
Semi-finals
Thompson J.[3]
Popyrin A.[5]
6-46-2
Evans D.[1]
Sock J.[7]
7-56-3
Quarter-finals
Thompson J.[3]
Kukushkin M.
6-24-66-3
Sock J.[7]
Broady L.
7-631-66-4
Evans D.[1]
Huesler M.[8]
6-46-4
Popyrin A.[5]
Peniston R.
6-36-4
R16
Peniston R.
Gojo B.
6-47-64
Popyrin A.[5]
Escoffier A.
6-37-5
Kukushkin M.
Verdasco F.[6]
6-36-726-4
Thompson J.[3]
Clarke J.
6-46-4
Evans D.[1]
Fabbiano T.
7-56-0
Sock J.[7]
Blancaneaux G.
6-04-66-2
Broady L.
Virtanen O.
2-67-56-2
Huesler M.[8]
Cox D.
6-24-66-2
R32
Peniston R.
Vesely J.[2]
6-777-657-66
Popyrin A.[5]
Lacko L.
6-46-2
Gojo B.
Jung J.
6-27-63
Escoffier A.
Pouille L.
5-76-46-4
Clarke J.
Jubb P.
6-36-2
Kukushkin M.
Copil M.
6-46-4
Sock J.[7]
Squire H.
6-27-67
Blancaneaux G.
Ramanathan R.
7-637-5
Virtanen O.
Millman J.[4]
7-656-3
Cox D.
Gaio F.
2-66-46-3
Evans D.[1]
Couacaud E.
7-57-63
Thompson J.[3]
Bellier A.
6-36-4
Fabbiano T.
Ajdukovic D.
4-67-636-4
Broady L.
Lestienne C.
6-44-66-3
Huesler M.[8]
Escobedo E.
6-46-4
Verdasco F.[6]
Gray A.
7-637-66