Jenson Brooksby vs Jesper De Jong — s Hertogenbosch Round of 32

s Hertogenbosch · ATP · Round of 32
Jenson Brooksby
USA8
Jenson Brooksby
#76ATP
1694ELO
1634Grass ELO
$530kYTD
$3.8MCAREER
25 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWLWLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 6 June 2022
grass
Jesper De Jong
NEDWC
Jesper De Jong
#73ATP
1711ELO
1536Grass ELO
$612kYTD
$2.3MCAREER
26 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWLWWWWWL
Brooksby J.
7-6 6-3
De Jong J.
Brooksby J.
7762
De Jong J.
6330

Jenson Brooksby defeated Jesper De Jong 7-6 6-3 in the s Hertogenbosch round of 32 on grass. The upset overturned the form book — Jesper De Jong came in ranked #73.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Brooksby J.serving79% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs De Jong J.

De Jong J.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Brooksby J.

Serve advantage — De Jong J.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Brooksby J.De Jong J.
1st serve in·Slight edge
64%
59%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
67%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
50%
Service points won·Even
61%
63%
Return points won·Even
38%
40%
Break points saved·Even
59%
59%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.0
5.7
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.9
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (119 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Brooksby J.De Jong J.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
89
56
Break points saved·Slight edge
97
90
Break points won·Dominant
78
37
Deciding sets·Dominant
96
69
Tiebreaks·Dominant
99
57

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Brooksby J.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
De Jong J.
4.5
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Form & Matchup
7.2+98 Grass Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.8Grass Elo 1536
6.3Overall Elo 1694
ELO gap
3.7Overall Elo 1711
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
8.0
Surface form
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
7.0
3-set count
7.0
3.0
Surface transition
3.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Brooksby J.De Jong J.
Freshness·Even
92
92

Brooksby J.: 10 days rest · 3 matches (14d) · De Jong J.: 12 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Van Rijthoven T.
Medvedev D.[3]
6-46-1
Semi-finals
Van Rijthoven T.
Auger Aliassime F.[1]
6-31-67-65
Medvedev D.[3]
Mannarino A.
7-57-5
Quarter-finals
Mannarino A.
Nakashima B.
6-756-16-4
Van Rijthoven T.
Gaston H.
7-626-4
Medvedev D.[3]
Ivashka I.
7-686-4
Auger Aliassime F.[1]
Khachanov K.[5]
7-656-4
R16
Nakashima B.
Querrey S.
7-647-66
Ivashka I.
Ruusuvuori E.
6-46-2
Gaston H.
Brooksby J.[8]
3-66-37-5
Auger Aliassime F.[1]
Griekspoor T.[6]
7-627-65
Khachanov K.[5]
Majchrzak K.
5-77-57-65
Van Rijthoven T.
Fritz T.[3]
6-797-56-4
Mannarino A.
De Minaur A.[2]
6-26-3
Medvedev D.[3]
Simon G.
7-56-4
R32
Brooksby J.[8]
De Jong J.
7-636-3
Van Rijthoven T.
Ebden M.
7-647-69
Mannarino A.
Seppi A.
7-647-69
Griekspoor T.[6]
Bedene A.
7-57-5
Querrey S.
Haase R.
6-36-2
Gaston H.
Kwon S.
6-26-1
Nakashima B.
Paul T.[7]
6-747-657-62
Majchrzak K.
Koepfer D.
6-16-4
Ruusuvuori E.
Van De Zandschulp B.[6]
4-66-26-1
Simon G.
Duckworth J.
6-47-69
Khachanov K.[5]
Tabilo A.
6-36-3
Ivashka I.
Mcdonald M.
6-36-786-1