Hugo Gaston vs Jenson Brooksby — s Hertogenbosch Round of 16

s Hertogenbosch · ATP · Round of 16
Hugo Gaston
FRA
Hugo Gaston
#107ATP
1622ELO
1509Grass ELO
$355kYTD
$4.0MCAREER
25 yrs · 173 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLWWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 6 June 2022
grass
Jenson Brooksby
USA8
Jenson Brooksby
#76ATP
1694ELO
1634Grass ELO
$530kYTD
$3.8MCAREER
25 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWLWLLL
Gaston H.
3-6 6-3 7-5
Brooksby J.
Gaston H.
3672
Brooksby J.
6351

Hugo Gaston defeated Jenson Brooksby 3-6 6-3 7-5 in the s Hertogenbosch round of 16 on grass. The upset overturned the form book — Jenson Brooksby came in ranked #76.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Gaston H.serving81% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Brooksby J.

Brooksby J.serving81% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Gaston H.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Gaston H.Brooksby J.
1st serve in·Slight edge
55%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
51%
Service points won·Even
60%
61%
Return points won·Even
39%
38%
Break points saved·Even
59%
59%
Aces / match·Even
2.9
3.0
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.2
1.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 119). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Gaston H.Brooksby J.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
74
89
Break points saved·Slight edge
91
97
Break points won·Clear edge
57
78
Deciding sets·Clear edge
78
96
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
93
99

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Gaston H.
4.5
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Brooksby J.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Form & Matchup
3.4Grass Elo 1509
Surface ELO
6.6+125 Grass Elo edge
3.9Overall Elo 1622
ELO gap
6.1Overall Elo 1694
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
Surface form
8.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
0.0
3-set count
7.0
3.0
Surface transition
3.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Gaston H.Brooksby J.
Freshness·Dominant
44
92

Gaston H.: 1 day rest · 5 matches, 128 games (7d) · Brooksby J.: 10 days rest · 3 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Van Rijthoven T.
Medvedev D.[3]
6-46-1
Semi-finals
Van Rijthoven T.
Auger Aliassime F.[1]
6-31-67-65
Medvedev D.[3]
Mannarino A.
7-57-5
Quarter-finals
Mannarino A.
Nakashima B.
6-756-16-4
Van Rijthoven T.
Gaston H.
7-626-4
Medvedev D.[3]
Ivashka I.
7-686-4
Auger Aliassime F.[1]
Khachanov K.[5]
7-656-4
R16
Nakashima B.
Querrey S.
7-647-66
Ivashka I.
Ruusuvuori E.
6-46-2
Gaston H.
Brooksby J.[8]
3-66-37-5
Auger Aliassime F.[1]
Griekspoor T.[6]
7-627-65
Khachanov K.[5]
Majchrzak K.
5-77-57-65
Van Rijthoven T.
Fritz T.[3]
6-797-56-4
Mannarino A.
De Minaur A.[2]
6-26-3
Medvedev D.[3]
Simon G.
7-56-4
R32
Brooksby J.[8]
De Jong J.
7-636-3
Van Rijthoven T.
Ebden M.
7-647-69
Mannarino A.
Seppi A.
7-647-69
Griekspoor T.[6]
Bedene A.
7-57-5
Querrey S.
Haase R.
6-36-2
Gaston H.
Kwon S.
6-26-1
Nakashima B.
Paul T.[7]
6-747-657-62
Majchrzak K.
Koepfer D.
6-16-4
Ruusuvuori E.
Van De Zandschulp B.[6]
4-66-26-1
Simon G.
Duckworth J.
6-47-69
Khachanov K.[5]
Tabilo A.
6-36-3
Ivashka I.
Mcdonald M.
6-36-786-1